If you’ll excuse me but I’ve a mountain to climb. I will see you all at 9.
The Fellowship of the Ring Werewolf
(14-10-2025, 10:46 AM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(14-10-2025, 10:43 AM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: Interesting choice by the GM for a seer if that is what Prada was.
Was Maeve a NRV or was whisperer a role do ye think?
Maeve was a hobbit
So the other hobbits knew who you were, but you didn't know Marve was a hobbit?
(14-10-2025, 05:04 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: Eddie is full of it. In my humble opinion
In my humble opinion, pot, meet kettle.
(14-10-2025, 08:40 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: I’ll move off Edward too. Rhoda should have enough votes in her so I’m gonna go Mick.
(14-10-2025, 08:51 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:Apart from the counter claim, this is the most suspicious thing you did all game. It makes NO sense.(14-10-2025, 08:42 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote: Explain this reasoning?
Because I think that it’s possible that himself and yerself are wolves who knew Betty was a lost cause as a lower tiered wolf.
Rhoda will have the numbers for lynch and if she returns wolf you two are even more suspect to me.
(14-10-2025, 08:54 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(14-10-2025, 08:51 PM)Vincent the Artist Wrote: I think we should avoid speculating on potential characters roles in case we assist the wolves in making fake claims with them.
I think isuldur (the guy who didn't throw the ring into the fire) is very unlikely to be in this game.
what’s his descendants name that is in the film? That’s who I’m thinking of. The moody sexy one
Ah look, the wolf buddies were teasing us on thread.
(Yesterday, 04:48 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:31 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: But Pat and Magda were working on the same informaiton that we are. Only the wolves know who the villagers are. Are you saying, categorically, that all the HObbits knew who each other were from the outset?Yes
i cant elaborate further than that. Those the rules.
See first post above.
Oops wrong again. You knew it was Maeve. I need to concentrate on one thing. I can't multi task
(Yesterday, 04:28 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:25 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: At that stage I had made a big post about Ina and voted for her and I had been quizzed on being on a team with betty.
Betty the wolf had been lynched at this stage.
Ina was trusted and was just beow me in both lists.
Why would Magda and Pat have such trust in me?
I checked Ina. She is clear from my POV.
Edward also action tracked Ina. Clear.
You have a seer power @Frank the Tank ? Since when?
(Yesterday, 04:48 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:31 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: But Pat and Magda were working on the same informaiton that we are. Only the wolves know who the villagers are. Are you saying, categorically, that all the HObbits knew who each other were from the outset?Yes
i cant elaborate further than that. Those the rules.
William, on your spreadsheets, can you check whether any of the Hobbits we are aware of voted for one another and/or Benjamin at any stage. And also, if Benjamin voted for any of them at any stage, please
(Yesterday, 05:09 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:48 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: Yes
i cant elaborate further than that. Those the rules.
William, on your spreadsheets, can you check whether any of the Hobbits we are aware of voted for one another and/or Benjamin at any stage. And also, if Benjamin voted for any of them at any stage, please
a hobbit never voted for another hobbit, or for benjamin.
benjamin actually didn't get a vote till last night.
pat (known hobbit) voted for laura night 3
(Yesterday, 05:06 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:28 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote: I checked Ina. She is clear from my POV.
Edward also action tracked Ina. Clear.
You have a seer power @Frank the Tank ? Since when?
I had a one time power. It wasn't a seer power, more an alignment check. I checked Ina night one. We discussed this on the thread on Wednesday I think.
(Yesterday, 04:13 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:39 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: First thought based on this in the OP:
"Avoid character reveals", how does this work is a RV is up for lynch? If they can't reveal we could end up lynching them. Am I missing something here? Can they say they have a role?
Thoughts on players
Betty - a lot of fluff and character posts, also spotted something there too
Rhoda - a lot of fluff
Ina - village lean here, not afraid to get stuck in
Benjamin - neutral lean, is posting and seems to be trying figure it out
Pat - I didn't read their post as suggesting there was only one wolf, he jad actually said 'more than one'. Very defensive when called on it or when others said he was suspicious. Later said Vernon didn't want discussion of wolf numbers, that's not true either. Not sure what to make of Pat.
Edward - nothing to go on here
Prada - village lean here
Vernon - must be a newish player as asked what pocketing is. Village lean here.
Frank - fluff
Magda - called out Wendy for the back room reference and Wendy for AI, later said Vernon pocketed Wendy. Village lean here.
Wendy - made a big deal of Pat's post when he clearly said likely more than one wolf. Lot of reaction testing, FFAed Betty, Prada and Magda. #57 said Betty is a provable load but didn't really explain it when asked by Prada, Betty and Vernon, I still don't understand the "making up a narrative" bit. AI no sense. Called Magda a WOLF!!!! Asked Benjamin to explain RVS and pocketing in their own words - don't see the point of this. Wolf lean here.
William - more fluff, spreadsheets, suss of Pat.
Mick - couple of posts today, spotted autopriest only being mentioned for lynch, asked Wendy why she expected flips for flavour kills this morning.
16 players, so agree on 3/4 wolves.
(Yesterday, 02:18 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: Does three not seem low in the case of 16 original players? I don't know really.I'll be out for a few hours from around half 4, this list was my honest reads at the time when there was very little to go on. This is what everyone jumped on, but look at the first paragraph.
I mean the two we have killed (by default or otherwise) are not Sauruman nor Sauron. I don't know enough about LOTR- in my head Sauron was just the big eye thingy (it's been a while since I watched, and my son who read all the books is away), but I take it "he" was a character of sorts, not just a spirit/being. Therefore it would make sense that he features in some capacity. So Ben is Sauraman, let's say. And then is there a greater evil in Sauron?
It was my seventh post, Google my character with the number seven.
😂
Did any of you Google as Laura asked?
She’s taking the P out of you lads and rock solid evidence like this is what you’re pinning your hopes on!
🤣🤣🤣
I did google and it elicited nothing
(Yesterday, 05:59 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:13 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: I'll be out for a few hours from around half 4, this list was my honest reads at the time when there was very little to go on. This is what everyone jumped on, but look at the first paragraph.
It was my seventh post, Google my character with the number seven.
😂
Did any of you Google as Laura asked?
She’s taking the P out of you lads and rock solid evidence like this is what you’re pinning your hopes on!
🤣🤣🤣
Again. Pot. Kettle.
seven dwarves? hardly when she was pipping in here to say she was a hobbit...
*popping
(Yesterday, 05:59 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 04:13 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: I'll be out for a few hours from around half 4, this list was my honest reads at the time when there was very little to go on. This is what everyone jumped on, but look at the first paragraph.
It was my seventh post, Google my character with the number seven.
😂
Did any of you Google as Laura asked?
She’s taking the P out of you lads and rock solid evidence like this is what you’re pinning your hopes on!
🤣🤣🤣
So mocking the rest of the players rather than proving your claim is your plan then?
What else does the ring do Ben, come on now surely you can tell us what other fancy tricks it has
(Yesterday, 01:35 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote:(Yesterday, 10:31 AM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote: @William the Grave Robber Laura posted explaining what happened.One power of the ring is to change the lynch to guarantee a wolf is killed, the wolf is randed so Vincent was killed.
It's definitely ring connected anyways, the mods post even alluded to it
Initially I thought that it might be an auto power from Vinnie as captain of the Uruk-Hai protecting his leader, but based on the mod post I think the simplest explanation is that the ring randed the lynch onto someone voting Laura. Or possibly just amongst everyone else.
@Laura the Lace Mistress can you elaborate further?
If Laura and the rest of you think I’m a wolf then, according to Laura, the ring had no need to change the lynch as a successful lynching was already guaranteed.
Laura does not have the ring but if you think she does then make her statement make sense.
And I swear there’s a load of you that have been compromised and are now on the dark side. Some of you are not even attempting to look at both sides.
(Yesterday, 06:12 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 01:35 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: One power of the ring is to change the lynch to guarantee a wolf is killed, the wolf is randed so Vincent was killed.
If Laura and the rest of you think I’m a wolf then, according to Laura, the ring had no need to change the lynch as a successful lynching was already guaranteed.
Laura does not have the ring but if you think she does then make her statement make sense.
If it is an action, the action would be carried out regardless of a wolf or villager being lynched. The action is worded "change the lynch to guarantee a wolf is killed", the votes don't matter. It is then RNG as to who of the wolves.
I don't fully understand this either TBQH, however, on balance of probabilities, this by itself is not a smoking gun. The balance of probability points squarely at you.
(Yesterday, 06:04 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: I did google and it elicited nothing
i got some results for scottie pippin, but he never wore the #7.
and another thing: How did Pippin and Merry contribute to the Fellowship?
7) Pippin saved Faramir II from being burned to death by his deranged father Denethor II. In doing so, he helped bring together Faramir and Éowyn whose marriage forged even closer ties of alliance between Gondor and Rohan.
https://www.quora.com/How-did-Pippin-and...%20King%20...
(Yesterday, 06:16 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: And I swear there’s a load of you that have been compromised and are now on the dark side. Some of you are not even attempting to look at both sides.
Because your claim doesn't add up Ben. It's that simple. You're implying that all the hobbits knew each other. 4 villagers. As a solid voting block.
Answer this so, given you knew Frodo, Sam and Merry from the beginning. Why did you all not vote as a core block of villagers given you'd have absolute trust and confidence in their reads. Knowing they were also on the side of good.
Instead, you went off on a solo run three nights running voting for Mick instead of trusting your fellow hobbits.
Your claim has more holes than the Titanic after it struck the iceberg mate
(Yesterday, 06:17 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:(Yesterday, 06:12 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: If Laura and the rest of you think I’m a wolf then, according to Laura, the ring had no need to change the lynch as a successful lynching was already guaranteed.
Laura does not have the ring but if you think she does then make her statement make sense.
If it is an action, the action would be carried out regardless of a wolf or villager being lynched. The action is worded "change the lynch to guarantee a wolf is killed", the votes don't matter. It is then RNG as to who of the wolves.
I don't fully understand this either TBQH, however, on balance of probabilities, this by itself is not a smoking gun. The balance of probability points squarely at you.
Yet no other ring bearer used this power until last night ?
(Yesterday, 06:21 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 06:17 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote: If it is an action, the action would be carried out regardless of a wolf or villager being lynched. The action is worded "change the lynch to guarantee a wolf is killed", the votes don't matter. It is then RNG as to who of the wolves.
I don't fully understand this either TBQH, however, on balance of probabilities, this by itself is not a smoking gun. The balance of probability points squarely at you.
Yet no other ring bearer used this power until last night ?
I trust it more than your claim that all the other hobbits knew each other. And that Vincent would vote for a fellow wolf when the vote was that close last night.
Ina would you please take the blinkers off
There are just too many things that aren't adding up in your story that can't be explained away
Fair enough. No more I can do at this stage. The game is in your hand folks. My vote will remain on Laura.
There is absolutely no way that Magda nor Pat wouldn't have used that hobbit info to form a village core. I refuse to believe they never once considered that they had a massive, massive power at lynch time and decided, nah.... We'll vote seperately with other unknown aligned players.
(Yesterday, 06:26 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote:(Yesterday, 06:24 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: Ina would you please take the blinkers off
Answer my questions then.
What else can the ring do.
Why didn't you trust the other hobbits and vote with them, given you all knew each other.
Every player in this game has free will to vote for whoever we want. Why would we all vote the same when we didn’t know who the wolves were?
You want information regarding the ring to be put on the thread? Not gonna happen.
whats more likely:
![[Image: Ayz2w9I.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Ayz2w9I.png)
i think in all these scenarios, vincent voting for laura is entirely irrelevant (can someone check this for me, as i'm after confusing myself), so that fact should not play a role in making a decision.
![[Image: Ayz2w9I.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Ayz2w9I.png)
i think in all these scenarios, vincent voting for laura is entirely irrelevant (can someone check this for me, as i'm after confusing myself), so that fact should not play a role in making a decision.
Is there just one wolf left in your view @Benjamin the Alchemist
Is someone on here protecting Laura?
Is someone on here protecting Laura?
@Laura the Lace Mistress If the Hobbits all knew one another as Ben claims, why did Pat vote for you?
(Yesterday, 06:32 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: Is there just one wolf left in your view @Benjamin the AlchemistI honestly don’t know. Lynch Laura and we will find out.
Is someone on here protecting Laura?
(Yesterday, 06:30 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote:(Yesterday, 06:26 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote: Answer my questions then.
What else can the ring do.
Why didn't you trust the other hobbits and vote with them, given you all knew each other.
Every player in this game has free will to vote for whoever we want. Why would we all vote the same when we didn’t know who the wolves were?
You want information regarding the ring to be put on the thread? Not gonna happen.
Because that way you can guarantee the most suspect by other KNOWN villagers will likely be lynched.
Remember, you are making the claim that 4 villagers knew each other right from the very beginning which meant the wolves were in the other 12 players
(Yesterday, 06:37 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote:(Yesterday, 06:30 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: Every player in this game has free will to vote for whoever we want. Why would we all vote the same when we didn’t know who the wolves were?
You want information regarding the ring to be put on the thread? Not gonna happen.
Because that way you can guarantee the most suspect by other KNOWN villagers will likely be lynched.
Remember, you are making the claim that 4 villagers knew each other right from the very beginning which meant the wolves were in the other 12 players
Block voting would be used to protect the block. If you’re not in the block, you’re an unknown.
why did Pat vote for Laura then?
if you are voting in a block @Benjamin the Alchemist
Users browsing this thread: 1 Invisible User(s), 1 Guest(s)