(13-10-2025, 03:23 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:Sorry Pat. What's this all about?(13-10-2025, 03:18 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: You saidChrist on a bike I really do have to explain this again
"Just the one wolf and a serial killer mentioned in the first post? Guessing there are more wolves".
This was simply untrue. They spoke of “wolves” in the plural, more than once. And to say one is merely guessing there are more wolves feels hollow. Guessing? Of course there are more. There was never going to be a lone wolf, such a thing would not make sense.
It reads as though you strain to seem blind to the truth of their number — yet I suspect you knew full well how many there are.
I was saying there was 1 wolf name mentioned in the OP- Sauron.. Although from what others have said etc Sauron may not even be a wolf.. That is literally all I was saying, and that my guess is there are more than 1 wolf but we don't know cause it's not mentioned. I have no idea about Lord of the Rings so I was working from the original post & what was mentioned
I never never ever mentioned a lone wolf, or that there is just 1 wolf in this game. And you're only talking about this this wolves plural stuff from the OP now, after others have mentioned it probably over 24 hours ago
I'm not explaining this to anyone again, it's ridiculous
The Fellowship of the Ring Werewolf
(13-10-2025, 03:31 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:23 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote: Christ on a bike I really do have to explain this againSorry Pat. What's this all about?
I was saying there was 1 wolf name mentioned in the OP- Sauron.. Although from what others have said etc Sauron may not even be a wolf.. That is literally all I was saying, and that my guess is there are more than 1 wolf but we don't know cause it's not mentioned. I have no idea about Lord of the Rings so I was working from the original post & what was mentioned
I never never ever mentioned a lone wolf, or that there is just 1 wolf in this game. And you're only talking about this this wolves plural stuff from the OP now, after others have mentioned it probably over 24 hours ago
I'm not explaining this to anyone again, it's ridiculous
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExeHo3ZmN0bTY3OGVrNnRwcTVkemdleXVhMDIwNTZ2bnZsbjg0ZDI3biZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/YtvCIwqNJhUmA/giphy.gif)
(13-10-2025, 03:23 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:18 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: You saidChrist on a bike I really do have to explain this again
"Just the one wolf and a serial killer mentioned in the first post? Guessing there are more wolves".
This was simply untrue. They spoke of “wolves” in the plural, more than once. And to say one is merely guessing there are more wolves feels hollow. Guessing? Of course there are more. There was never going to be a lone wolf, such a thing would not make sense.
It reads as though you strain to seem blind to the truth of their number — yet I suspect you knew full well how many there are.
I was saying there was 1 wolf name mentioned in the OP- Sauron.. Although from what others have said etc Sauron may not even be a wolf.. That is literally all I was saying, and that my guess is there are more than 1 wolf but we don't know cause it's not mentioned. I have no idea about Lord of the Rings so I was working from the original post & what was mentioned
I never never ever mentioned a lone wolf, or that there is just 1 wolf in this game. And you're only talking about this this wolves plural stuff from the OP now, after others have mentioned it probably over 24 hours ago
I'm not explaining this to anyone again, it's ridiculous
This is quite unfair.
You asked them to answer the question you posed.
Then when they do you spout this dribble about christ cycling and answer stuff after 24hrs.
You specifically ASKED them to answer the question. If it was stale, why did you ask them to answer a stale question!
Ah you couldn't fool @Pat the Baker that easily @Prada the Seamstress he's very self awere
(13-10-2025, 03:29 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote:Nah sorry, you're questioning something that has been explained multiple times. So you're either not reading my posts, piggybacking on others from yesterday or you just need to throw a bit of shade around(13-10-2025, 03:23 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote: Christ on a bike I really do have to explain this again
I was saying there was 1 wolf name mentioned in the OP- Sauron.. Although from what others have said etc Sauron may not even be a wolf.. That is literally all I was saying, and that my guess is there are more than 1 wolf but we don't know cause it's not mentioned. I have no idea about Lord of the Rings so I was working from the original post & what was mentioned
I never never ever mentioned a lone wolf, or that there is just 1 wolf in this game. And you're only talking about this this wolves plural stuff from the OP now, after others have mentioned it probably over 24 hours ago
I'm not explaining this to anyone again, it's ridiculous
Woah calm down.
You're really huffing and puffing.
Trying to say I was making out this game had 1 wolf total in it is total bs, and if you talk bs I'm calling it out
(13-10-2025, 03:21 PM)Wendy the Wench Wrote:(13-10-2025, 02:20 PM)Magda the Maid Wrote: ^ that's not to say it couldn't happen and that Ina is village. Just the post is a villagery post.
I'm not following.
ina has posted something that you think comes from a village mindset, so the post is villagery,
but its not impossible for ina to be a village.
Is that what you meant to say, or was their a typo somewhere?
Would ina be you top villager?
Yeah a typo, it should be
that's not to say that it couldn't happen. Or to say Ina is village. Just the post is a villagery post.
I have some suspicions on Ina as I had noted earlier. I don't think they are doing much with their posts so no they wouldn't be my top villager
First thought based on this in the OP:
"Avoid character reveals", how does this work is a RV is up for lynch? If they can't reveal we could end up lynching them. Am I missing something here? Can they say they have a role?
Thoughts on players
Betty - a lot of fluff and character posts, also spotted something there too
Rhoda - a lot of fluff
Ina - village lean here, not afraid to get stuck in
Benjamin - neutral lean, is posting and seems to be trying figure it out
Pat - I didn't read their post as suggesting there was only one wolf, he jad actually said 'more than one'. Very defensive when called on it or when others said he was suspicious. Later said Vernon didn't want discussion of wolf numbers, that's not true either. Not sure what to make of Pat.
Edward - nothing to go on here
Prada - village lean here
Vernon - must be a newish player as asked what pocketing is. Village lean here.
Frank - fluff
Magda - called out Wendy for the back room reference and Wendy for AI, later said Vernon pocketed Wendy. Village lean here.
Wendy - made a big deal of Pat's post when he clearly said likely more than one wolf. Lot of reaction testing, FFAed Betty, Prada and Magda. #57 said Betty is a provable load but didn't really explain it when asked by Prada, Betty and Vernon, I still don't understand the "making up a narrative" bit. AI no sense. Called Magda a WOLF!!!! Asked Benjamin to explain RVS and pocketing in their own words - don't see the point of this. Wolf lean here.
William - more fluff, spreadsheets, suss of Pat.
Mick - couple of posts today, spotted autopriest only being mentioned for lynch, asked Wendy why she expected flips for flavour kills this morning.
16 players, so agree on 3/4 wolves.
"Avoid character reveals", how does this work is a RV is up for lynch? If they can't reveal we could end up lynching them. Am I missing something here? Can they say they have a role?
Thoughts on players
Betty - a lot of fluff and character posts, also spotted something there too
Rhoda - a lot of fluff
Ina - village lean here, not afraid to get stuck in
Benjamin - neutral lean, is posting and seems to be trying figure it out
Pat - I didn't read their post as suggesting there was only one wolf, he jad actually said 'more than one'. Very defensive when called on it or when others said he was suspicious. Later said Vernon didn't want discussion of wolf numbers, that's not true either. Not sure what to make of Pat.
Edward - nothing to go on here
Prada - village lean here
Vernon - must be a newish player as asked what pocketing is. Village lean here.
Frank - fluff
Magda - called out Wendy for the back room reference and Wendy for AI, later said Vernon pocketed Wendy. Village lean here.
Wendy - made a big deal of Pat's post when he clearly said likely more than one wolf. Lot of reaction testing, FFAed Betty, Prada and Magda. #57 said Betty is a provable load but didn't really explain it when asked by Prada, Betty and Vernon, I still don't understand the "making up a narrative" bit. AI no sense. Called Magda a WOLF!!!! Asked Benjamin to explain RVS and pocketing in their own words - don't see the point of this. Wolf lean here.
William - more fluff, spreadsheets, suss of Pat.
Mick - couple of posts today, spotted autopriest only being mentioned for lynch, asked Wendy why she expected flips for flavour kills this morning.
16 players, so agree on 3/4 wolves.
(13-10-2025, 03:36 PM)Wendy the Wench Wrote:Because the entire basis of their point against me was based on something that isn't true. That's why. I never said what they are accusing me of(13-10-2025, 03:23 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote: Christ on a bike I really do have to explain this again
I was saying there was 1 wolf name mentioned in the OP- Sauron.. Although from what others have said etc Sauron may not even be a wolf.. That is literally all I was saying, and that my guess is there are more than 1 wolf but we don't know cause it's not mentioned. I have no idea about Lord of the Rings so I was working from the original post & what was mentioned
I never never ever mentioned a lone wolf, or that there is just 1 wolf in this game. And you're only talking about this this wolves plural stuff from the OP now, after others have mentioned it probably over 24 hours ago
I'm not explaining this to anyone again, it's ridiculous
This is quite unfair.
You asked them to answer the question you posed.
Then when they do you spout this dribble about christ cycling and answer stuff after 24hrs.
You specifically ASKED them to answer the question. If it was stale, why did you ask them to answer a stale question!
I'm not leaving a baseless accusation out there
Can someone more able than I do apost count check just so I can run my theory of a wolf in a high poster and the rest in the lowers ones?
(13-10-2025, 03:38 PM)Magda the Maid Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:21 PM)Wendy the Wench Wrote: I'm not following.
ina has posted something that you think comes from a village mindset, so the post is villagery,
but its not impossible for ina to be a village.
Is that what you meant to say, or was their a typo somewhere?
Would ina be you top villager?
Yeah a typo, it should be
that's not to say that it couldn't happen. Or to say Ina is village. Just the post is a villagery post.
I have some suspicions on Ina as I had noted earlier. I don't think they are doing much with their posts so no they wouldn't be my top villager
What does 'doing much with ones posts' entail exactly though?
I see stuff, I call it out.
I don't think anyone else is doing much different!
(13-10-2025, 03:37 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote:Ha ok I legit thought you were taking the piss(13-10-2025, 03:34 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:It's fine, dont worry about it. I have a bit of time to read back now. I just wasn't 100 percent sure so thought it might be quicker to ask
Few people have jumped on my very first post of the game, trying to make out I was saying there was just 1 wolf in the game. Vern brought it up again today in a slightly roundabout way so I wanted to see what their actualy accusation was
Read my first post of the game basically
(12-10-2025, 03:42 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: Greetings all!
I see evil hides in our midst but they shall not remain unpunished. By the Valar, they shall be unmasked and face retribution!
There is little to be gained in bickering over the number wolves. We can assume there are multiples. The most important thing is to stick together and do not allow them to divide us. There is strength in numbers.
@Laura the Lace Mistress in reply to your read on me there.. Vern did say they don't want us discussing wolf numbers. Right here
(13-10-2025, 03:43 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:Appreciate it, I'll read that post(13-10-2025, 03:37 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote: It's fine, dont worry about it. I have a bit of time to read back now. I just wasn't 100 percent sure so thought it might be quicker to askHa ok I legit thought you were taking the piss
Few people have jumped on my very first post of the game, trying to make out I was saying there was just 1 wolf in the game. Vern brought it up again today in a slightly roundabout way so I wanted to see what their actualy accusation was
Read my first post of the game basically
(13-10-2025, 03:38 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:29 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: Woah calm down.Nah sorry, you're questioning something that has been explained multiple times. So you're either not reading my posts, piggybacking on others from yesterday or you just need to throw a bit of shade around
You're really huffing and puffing.
Trying to say I was making out this game had 1 wolf total in it is total bs, and if you talk bs I'm calling it out
You know even through acronyms you really shouldn't swere.
I quoted you. I didnt make out anything. Those were your words. As I explained, saying you 'guessed' there was more than one seemed insincere. Of course there is more than one. It came across as trying too hard imo to appear clueless to wolfy things.
Later you said I tried to shut down discussion on wolf numbers. Untrue. A deflection I believe.
I'm done with this now. I can't listen to anymore of your howling.
(13-10-2025, 03:47 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote:I've quoted your post where you said arguing about wolf numbers doesn't help.. Will I post it again for you?(13-10-2025, 03:38 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote: Nah sorry, you're questioning something that has been explained multiple times. So you're either not reading my posts, piggybacking on others from yesterday or you just need to throw a bit of shade around
Trying to say I was making out this game had 1 wolf total in it is total bs, and if you talk bs I'm calling it out
You know even through acronyms you really shouldn't swere.
I quoted you. I didnt make out anything. Those were your words. As I explained, saying you 'guessed' there was more than one seemed insincere. Of course there is more than one. It came across as trying too hard imo to appear clueless to wolfy things.
Later you said I tried to shut down discussion on wolf numbers. Untrue. A deflection I believe.
I'm done with this now. I can't listen to anymore of your howling.
(13-10-2025, 03:41 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote: Can someone more able than I do apost count check just so I can run my theory of a wolf in a high poster and the rest in the lowers ones?
Total Posts: 255
User # Posts
Pat the Baker 49
Magda the Maid 44
Ina May the Midwife 41
Wendy the Wench 24
Vernon the Ranger 20
Prada the Seamstress 13
Betty the Beggar 13
William the Grave Robber 11
Mick the Drunk 8
Laura the Lace Mistress 7
Rhoda the Spinster 7
E.N. 5
Frank the Tank 5
Benjamin the Alchemist 4
Edward the Barber 3
lorcand1990 1
(13-10-2025, 03:43 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:38 PM)Magda the Maid Wrote: Yeah a typo, it should be
that's not to say that it couldn't happen. Or to say Ina is village. Just the post is a villagery post.
I have some suspicions on Ina as I had noted earlier. I don't think they are doing much with their posts so no they wouldn't be my top villager
What does 'doing much with ones posts' entail exactly though?
I see stuff, I call it out.
I don't think anyone else is doing much different!
i dont think your posts are anything too much, as in you arent really pushing the boat so that wouldnt make me lean into villager at this time. And i agree, most people are the same. its been a bit of a weird start to the game
Take the top 3 posters. There's a wolf somewhere in there, trying to lead the village but posting fluff.
There is usually a wolf or more in the low posters skating by doing nothing.
I'll be voting in the lowest 3 posters but not any non poster
There is usually a wolf or more in the low posters skating by doing nothing.
I'll be voting in the lowest 3 posters but not any non poster
Have you any last words to say Pat?
(13-10-2025, 03:49 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:47 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: You know even through acronyms you really shouldn't swere.I've quoted your post where you said arguing about wolf numbers doesn't help.. Will I post it again for you?
I quoted you. I didnt make out anything. Those were your words. As I explained, saying you 'guessed' there was more than one seemed insincere. Of course there is more than one. It came across as trying too hard imo to appear clueless to wolfy things.
Later you said I tried to shut down discussion on wolf numbers. Untrue. A deflection I believe.
I'm done with this now. I can't listen to anymore of your howling.
Once again...
I was just pointing out that arguing about whether there's only one wolf seems a little pointless as we know that isn't likely at all. As I said 'We can assume there are multiples.'
So Im not exactly shutting down chat around wolf numbers.
Others (and indeed I myself) have spoken about wolf numbers many times. You're being completely insincere here again.
(13-10-2025, 01:51 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote: So 16 left, not 15.
Also happy resurrection day @Vincent the Artist
Does that change our calculations?
11 v 4 v 1 seems more plausible tbh
I only lost my ear in the end. It's good to be here
(13-10-2025, 03:46 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote:No, he said there's no point bickering over them, we can assume there's multiples. I guess it's how you interpret it, like how other have interpreted your post and think you stated there's only one wolf.(12-10-2025, 03:42 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote: Greetings all!
I see evil hides in our midst but they shall not remain unpunished. By the Valar, they shall be unmasked and face retribution!
There is little to be gained in bickering over the number wolves. We can assume there are multiples. The most important thing is to stick together and do not allow them to divide us. There is strength in numbers.
@Laura the Lace Mistress in reply to your read on me there.. Vern did say they don't want us discussing wolf numbers. Right here
I think Vernon was just saying there's no point arguing over something we don't know. We're guessing 3/4 wolves based on numbers but only the wolves know for sure. Villagers bickering over something we can't prove gives somewhere for wolves to hide.
(13-10-2025, 03:49 PM)Magda the Maid Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:43 PM)Ina May the Midwife Wrote: What does 'doing much with ones posts' entail exactly though?
I see stuff, I call it out.
I don't think anyone else is doing much different!
i dont think your posts are anything too much, as in you arent really pushing the boat so that wouldnt make me lean into villager at this time. And i agree, most people are the same. its been a bit of a weird start to the game
I think the lack of knowledge of exactly how many players there were threw everyone a bit last night.
Like, yeah we knew there definitely dummy accounts but nobody really knew how many were playing cos the sign ups were secret.
Couple that with this lot not even making 10 posts each as of the post count Wendy added just a few mins ago, and it's been a bit tough to get into this one, apart from explaining the lore etc. (which I have no trouble doing, it just doesn't advance the game state much).
Mick the Drunk 8
Laura the Lace Mistress 7
Rhoda the Spinster 7
Frank the Tank 5
Benjamin the Alchemist 4
Edward the Barber 3
@Wendy the Wench, why do you think Pat the Streaker will be lynched?
(13-10-2025, 04:02 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: @Wendy the Wench, why do you think Pat the Streaker will be lynched?
I was thinking more of a day time pow pow than a lynching.
I don’t see why there’s a bid deal being made out of Pat’s post tbh. I don’t see how saying “guessing more” aligns with being a wolf.
(13-10-2025, 03:39 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: First thought based on this in the OP:
"Avoid character reveals", how does this work is a RV is up for lynch? If they can't reveal we could end up lynching them. Am I missing something here? Can they say they have a role?
Thoughts on players
Betty - a lot of fluff and character posts, also spotted something there too
Rhoda - a lot of fluff
Ina - village lean here, not afraid to get stuck in
Benjamin - neutral lean, is posting and seems to be trying figure it out
Pat - I didn't read their post as suggesting there was only one wolf, he jad actually said 'more than one'. Very defensive when called on it or when others said he was suspicious. Later said Vernon didn't want discussion of wolf numbers, that's not true either. Not sure what to make of Pat.
Edward - nothing to go on here
Prada - village lean here
Vernon - must be a newish player as asked what pocketing is. Village lean here.
Frank - fluff
Magda - called out Wendy for the back room reference and Wendy for AI, later said Vernon pocketed Wendy. Village lean here.
Wendy - made a big deal of Pat's post when he clearly said likely more than one wolf. Lot of reaction testing, FFAed Betty, Prada and Magda. #57 said Betty is a provable load but didn't really explain it when asked by Prada, Betty and Vernon, I still don't understand the "making up a narrative" bit. AI no sense. Called Magda a WOLF!!!! Asked Benjamin to explain RVS and pocketing in their own words - don't see the point of this. Wolf lean here.
William - more fluff, spreadsheets, suss of Pat.
Mick - couple of posts today, spotted autopriest only being mentioned for lynch, asked Wendy why she expected flips for flavour kills this morning.
16 players, so agree on 3/4 wolves.
Benjamin is posting? I was missing from the thread until today basically and I have more posts than them. They are not posting, their only contribution to date has been the discourse over use of AI. Also 7 posts is " a lot" of fluff? I would contend 7 isn't a lot.
As for Vernon, if you read their posts there is more than just the asking about pocketing. And they have admitted themselves that they have played elsewhere.
What have you spotted on Betty?
Ah here, poor Pat.
There's nothing in that first post.
If you're going to lynch or shoot someone at least have a better reason than that post
There's nothing in that first post.
If you're going to lynch or shoot someone at least have a better reason than that post
(13-10-2025, 03:53 PM)Vernon the Ranger Wrote:In my opinion, the best thing to start talking about early on in the game are wolves. There really isn't anything else to discuss at that stage(13-10-2025, 03:49 PM)Pat the Baker Wrote: I've quoted your post where you said arguing about wolf numbers doesn't help.. Will I post it again for you?
Once again...
I was just pointing out that arguing about whether there's only one wolf seems a little pointless as we know that isn't likely at all. As I said 'We can assume there are multiples.'
So Im not exactly shutting down chat around wolf numbers.
Others (and indeed I myself) have spoken about wolf numbers many times. You're being completely insincere here again.
And yet here we are, arguing about one wolf, when I wasn't even saying there was

(13-10-2025, 04:15 PM)Wendy the Wench Wrote:So you want a players 'last words' based on that? Dodge(13-10-2025, 04:12 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote: Ah here, poor Pat.
There's nothing in that first post.
If you're going to lynch or shoot someone at least have a better reason than that post
It's not for their first post. It's for saying that Jesus was a cyclist.
That's just blasphemy!
Users browsing this thread: