Hurry up, Lorcan!!! Make her stop š
The Traitors- Boards/FOG Edition
(25-03-2026, 03:29 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote: Hurry up, Lorcan!!! Make her stop š
I'm having a moment @McDonald the Farmer betrayed by everyone. Unloved. Alone. My fate hanging in the balance of an unknown. Nowhere to turn.
All I want is a hug
Oohhh I could bring my ukulele to the campfire!! Do you know Kumbaya?
Friar Tuck
Betty the Beggar
Boris the Fool
Prada the Seamstress
Rhoda the Spinster
Congratulations, you have won a trip to the Armoury for a chance to win a prize. I will PM winners shortly
Betty the Beggar
Boris the Fool
Prada the Seamstress
Rhoda the Spinster
Congratulations, you have won a trip to the Armoury for a chance to win a prize. I will PM winners shortly
Lads/Ladies, ye are grasping at straws if you're trying to poke holes at n00b asking on day 1 if this is the only thread for the game.
Even putting a traitor hat on, why would I ask that question... as a traitor trying to be sneaky, what do I gain? It's just a n00b question.
Even putting a traitor hat on, why would I ask that question... as a traitor trying to be sneaky, what do I gain? It's just a n00b question.
(25-03-2026, 02:45 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote: Just back in time to submit my task response - phew! Had to look up a few answers, if Google wasn't allowed I'd be scuppered.
I'm finding it very interesting that both @Laura the Lace Mistress and @Dora the Explorer have queried me about not being present in the game or dipping in and out but now are doing the same themselves. Is it real or a tactic to avoid discussions and putting their heads above the parapet? I suppose we will see later when they resume posting.
(25-03-2026, 01:04 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: Sorry, I've a big work day today so I won't be quite as engaged as I was yesterday.
I'll try to trace back through this Prada thread later but my first instinct is to trust Betty's instinct on her (for obvious reasons).
I'm currently still a bit stuck on Friar (no change in reasons).
I'm also trying to look at where I haven't been looking, which is at the people I find quite helpful. With that in mind, McDonald... you come across as a really good faithful, you do your research, you aren't afraid to point a finger. I'm just wondering if it's possible you're a traitor trying to steer the pack or overwhelm the conversation with information. That is literally all I have on you because otherwise I think you come across as a good faithful.
(25-03-2026, 01:26 PM)Dora the Explorer Wrote: Hey all I have had some real life stuff to deal with today. I won't get on until around 5 to catch up. sorry can't be helped
You've been like this from day 1. I have been consistently active and engaged. And even with my "I'm swamped today" disclaimer at the top of the day, I'm still doing alright keeping up.
(25-03-2026, 03:17 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:Did you? Because you thanked my postĀ traight away and that was over 2 hours ago then decided to comment on it later.(25-03-2026, 01:26 PM)DoraĀ theĀ Explorer Wrote: Hey all I have had some real life stuff to deal with today. I won't get on until around 5 to catch up. sorry can't be helped
I forgot Dora was here! She would bring Boots to the campfire! Ola! Una, dos, tres!
(25-03-2026, 02:45 PM)FriarĀ Tuck Wrote: Just back in time to submit my task response - phew! Had to look up a few answers, if Google wasn't allowed I'd be scuppered.
I'm finding it very interesting that both @Laura the Lace Mistress and @Dora the Explorer have queried me about not being present in the game or dipping in and out but now are doing the same themselves. Is it real or a tactic to avoid discussions and putting their heads above the parapet? I suppose we will see later when they resume posting.
(25-03-2026, 01:04 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote: Sorry, I've a big work day today so I won't be quite as engaged as I was yesterday.
I'll try to trace back through this Prada thread later but my first instinct is to trust Betty's instinct on her (for obvious reasons).
I'm currently still a bit stuck on Friar (no change in reasons).
I'm also trying to look at where I haven't been looking, which is at the people I find quite helpful. With that in mind, McDonald... you come across as a really good faithful, you do your research, you aren't afraid to point a finger. I'm just wondering if it's possible you're a traitor trying to steer the pack or overwhelm the conversation with information. That is literally all I have on you because otherwise I think you come across as a good faithful.
(25-03-2026, 01:26 PM)DoraĀ theĀ Explorer Wrote: Hey all I have had some real life stuff to deal with today. I won't get on until around 5 to catch up. sorry can't be helped
Good shout out and very well put together post for a newbie get nay help?Ā What have I missed this morning in your opinion? Have you read the thread what's your general opinions.
(25-03-2026, 03:45 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote: Lads/Ladies, ye are grasping at straws if you're trying to poke holes at n00b asking on day 1 if this is the only thread for the game.Relax, Laura. It was just a question.
Even putting a traitor hat on, why would I ask that question... as a traitor trying to be sneaky, what do I gain? It's just a n00b question.
(25-03-2026, 03:00 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote:(25-03-2026, 02:30 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote: Iāve missed myself voting Boris on my last post.
One the first days banishment where there was definite vote manipulation there was clearly a 3 way race between Zeena, Ben and Betty. If we believe that Betty is a faithful then it was a 3 way race of faithfuls.
I think one of the winners of a prize caused vote manipulation of Ben which could be Laura or Friar. I also think a traitor would be in a smaller voting pool which is Countess, Weyland or Donald.
Prada has to be first out though.
I'm also looking at Laura now, she tried to focus attention on me for non-posting yesterday but was she just diverting attention from herself? She was in the armoury on day one and also voted for Ben that night whose vote we know was probably manipulated in some way. Then day two she won a seer check which is useless to a traitor so making that one public to reinforce being ''faithful" made sense
Not just the non-posting. The last minute vote against Benji on vote #1 without any context. At least I made my reasoning clear with Benji. I was also the first up to vote for him... I wasn't waiting to see who was going to go.
I was very transparent about the seer power all the way through. And I used it to clear Betty.... further vindicated by Vincent being revealed as a faithful... unless you believe Betty and I are working together as traitors but that would have been very high risk.
(25-03-2026, 03:47 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote:(25-03-2026, 02:45 PM)FriarĀ Tuck Wrote: Just back in time to submit my task response - phew! Had to look up a few answers, if Google wasn't allowed I'd be scuppered.
I'm finding it very interesting that both @Laura the Lace Mistress and @Dora the Explorer have queried me about not being present in the game or dipping in and out but now are doing the same themselves. Is it real or a tactic to avoid discussions and putting their heads above the parapet? I suppose we will see later when they resume posting.
You've been like this from day 1. I have been consistently active and engaged. And even with my "I'm swamped today" disclaimer at the top of the day, I'm still doing alright keeping up.
Ahh here and then we both turn up at same time to reply Ā š¤£š¤£ we doomedĀ ...
Just for everyone's reference I am meant to reply to Laura and it's not a slip. I came one and had a check of the mentions in the alerts š
(25-03-2026, 03:50 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote:(25-03-2026, 03:45 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote: Lads/Ladies, ye are grasping at straws if you're trying to poke holes at n00b asking on day 1 if this is the only thread for the game.Relax, Laura. It was just a question.
Even putting a traitor hat on, why would I ask that question... as a traitor trying to be sneaky, what do I gain? It's just a n00b question.
A really nitpicky, pointless question IMO. It was a n00b question asking about the gameplay on day 1.
And don't you know never to tell a lady to relax!
Ooohhhh guess who got an insta banishment? š¤©š„³š
@Laura the Lace Mistress @Dora the Explorer you guys are very defensive this afternoon. Is the pressure getting to you? Fighting with my poor bestie @McDonald the Farmer
If the game is too much, I can help out?
If the game is too much, I can help out?
Is Oscaring forbidden with the insta banishment? š¤
Ah jeez. Have at it, Prada
(25-03-2026, 03:14 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:If you've only got to this post, you best keep reading.(25-03-2026, 02:03 PM)WilliamĀ theĀ GraveĀ Robber Wrote: Easy answer to this Rhoda. It's not that I was not interested in Prada, it's that I thought the Pat post was a better avenue to go down. You obviously thought similar because you posted similar after.
I declined to answer this morning because I have to start again with my thinking. Not just going to throw a name out for no reason.
William I always knew you were a wise man.
Open wolfing at this stage
(25-03-2026, 04:02 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote: @Laura the Lace Mistress @Dora the Explorer you guys are very defensive this afternoon. Is the pressure getting to you? Fighting with my poor bestie @McDonald the Farmer
If the game is too much, I can help out?
Show me an example anywhere in this thread where someone being questioned by another player doesn't get defensive.
(24-03-2026, 01:01 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote:(24-03-2026, 12:56 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote: Itās in BIG BOLD MOD WRITING in the post directly above the one you quoted, Prada. š
Yes but did you know at the time of your decision?
Because what was the real reason then? Why would you have been afraid of banishment more so than murder?
I'm just finding it surprising you said banishment when murder was a bit more likely given you were one of the 5.
I would like to put forward this example of a so called task where I ask my bestie 3 questions, and guess what? HE WASN'T MURDERED IN PLAIN SIGHT
Wise. Not wide.
(25-03-2026, 04:15 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote:(24-03-2026, 01:01 PM)Prada the Seamstress Wrote: Yes but did you know at the time of your decision?
Because what was the real reason then? Why would you have been afraid of banishment more so than murder?
I'm just finding it surprising you said banishment when murder was a bit more likely given you were one of the 5.
I would like to put forward this example of a so called task where I ask my bestie 3 questions, and guess what? HE WASN'T MURDERED IN PLAIN SIGHT
Traitors can't murder each other though (assuming this works the same as the TV show)
(24-03-2026, 04:26 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:(24-03-2026, 04:17 PM)BettyĀ theĀ Beggar Wrote: I think the Prada call out was more likely
I don't think a murder in plain sight is as easy as a post talking to a user once over the day.
That's too easy. There has to be something we are missing.
I tried earlier going back over posts looking for Magda in them, across the post with capital letters etc. I'll start again with Maeve, but I don't think it's going to be something as glaringly obvious as one mention of the player.
(24-03-2026, 07:51 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:(24-03-2026, 07:14 PM)RhodaĀ theĀ Spinster Wrote: Could someone do a post count and show all the posts of the lowest five posters. Lilly is obviously contributing nothing but there are others like Chris hiding low as well.
They are no loss even if they are faithful.
My most suspect is Prada. The post were they ask Maeve three questions looks like a task in retrospect.
I'm happy to park that if people don't want to lose an obvious traitor and vote to banish elsewhere for the moment.
One post is hardly a task. It's also a task so obvious that I wouldn't do it if I was a traitor. You are tunnelling you have spotted this one thing, and you can't see past that. Have you looked at anything else?
I tried but kept getting SQL errors. I will try again this evening because all I know is it isn't me.
(25-03-2026, 10:22 AM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:(25-03-2026, 10:18 AM)RhodaĀ theĀ Spinster Wrote: You said you were going to do a look back. Did you see anyone else who could theoretically have killed Maeve?
No I didn't. I keep getting SQL errors and getting frustrated. I'm going to start work now. I'll try again later.
(25-03-2026, 04:11 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote:(25-03-2026, 04:02 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: @Laura the Lace Mistress @Dora the Explorer you guys are very defensive this afternoon. Is the pressure getting to you? Fighting with my poor bestie @McDonald the FarmerĀ
If the game is too much, I can help out?
Show me an example anywhere in this thread where someone being questioned by another player doesn't get defensive.
Some very fine examples here @Laura the Lace Mistress
I WOULD JUST LIKE EVERYONE TO KNOW I AM THE BEST FAITHFUL OF ALL TIME. EVERYONE IS SAYING IT.
MAC MY BESTIE IS SAYING IT. CHRIS MY OTHER BESTIE AGREES TOO. BETTY KNOW IT.
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED AND THE BLEACHER REPORT TOO.
MAC MY BESTIE IS SAYING IT. CHRIS MY OTHER BESTIE AGREES TOO. BETTY KNOW IT.
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED AND THE BLEACHER REPORT TOO.
(25-03-2026, 04:20 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:Yes, but you're on the same team, so you've already ok'd it in your back room(24-03-2026, 04:26 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: I don't think a murder in plain sight is as easy as a post talking to a user once over the day.
That's too easy. There has to be something we are missing.
I tried earlier going back over posts looking for Magda in them, across the post with capital letters etc. I'll start again with Maeve, but I don't think it's going to be something as glaringly obvious as one mention of the player.
(24-03-2026, 07:51 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: One post is hardly a task. It's also a task so obvious that I wouldn't do it if I was a traitor. You are tunnelling you have spotted this one thing, and you can't see past that. Have you looked at anything else?
I tried but kept getting SQL errors. I will try again this evening because all I know is it isn't me.
(25-03-2026, 10:22 AM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: No I didn't. I keep getting SQL errors and getting frustrated. I'm going to start work now. I'll try again later.
(25-03-2026, 04:11 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote: Show me an example anywhere in this thread where someone being questioned by another player doesn't get defensive.
Some very fine examples here @Laura the Lace Mistress
(25-03-2026, 02:47 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:Iāll be looking at the full picture and catching up later but this post makes me more suspicious of you prada. Going and digging up a post from the first afternoon of posting seems a bit of a stretch. It looks like youāve just found a post from a fairly trusted poster that throws doubt on a player who has already caught a few votes to deflect.Ā It might be just self preservation but coupled with the other murder in plain sight suspicion Iām coming around to writing your name this evening.(23-03-2026, 12:26 PM)BettyĀ theĀ Beggar Wrote: Seems to be a lot of theories flying around already, not sure how much we can take out of anything yet.
Boris is the only one who stood out, his interaction felt a bit forced. Not saying thereās anything in it yet, but itās probably the only thing that felt slightly off so far.
Otherwise Iād be wary of overreading things this early, most of this is just people filling space
You know what, I agree with this so much. I'm trying another read back, and there is just something weird about the Boris interaction. Not sitting right at all with me either.
(25-03-2026, 04:22 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: I WOULD JUST LIKE EVERYONE TO KNOW I AM THE BEST FAITHFUL OF ALL TIME. EVERYONE IS SAYING IT.Hey Becky, didn't know you were playing
MAC MY BESTIE IS SAYING IT. CHRIS MY OTHER BESTIE AGREES TOO. BETTY KNOW IT.
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED AND THE BLEACHER REPORT TOO.
(25-03-2026, 04:04 PM)RhodaĀ theĀ Spinster Wrote: Is Oscaring forbidden with the insta banishment? š¤
(25-03-2026, 04:15 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote:(24-03-2026, 01:01 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: Yes but did you know at the time of your decision?
Because what was the real reason then? Why would you have been afraid of banishment more so than murder?
I'm just finding it surprising you said banishment when murder was a bit more likely given you were one of the 5.
I would like to put forward this example of a so called task where I ask my bestie 3 questions, and guess what? HE WASN'T MURDERED IN PLAIN SIGHT
That was yesterday AFTER Lorcan announced someone was murdered in plain sight (10 AM). I presume he wasn't allowing you to murder all and sundry at will.
(25-03-2026, 04:24 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote:(25-03-2026, 04:04 PM)RhodaĀ theĀ Spinster Wrote: Is Oscaring forbidden with the insta banishment? š¤
(25-03-2026, 04:15 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: I would like to put forward this example of a so called task where I ask my bestie 3 questions, and guess what? HE WASN'T MURDERED IN PLAIN SIGHT
That was yesterday AFTER Lorcan announced someone was murdered in plain sight (10 AM). I presume he wasn't allowing you to murder all and sundry at will.
Lorcan is no fun either
except when he gives out Prizes!
Anything to be said for a speed day, this is just getting irritating at this point 𤣠You're lovely Prada, just a bit grating
(25-03-2026, 04:23 PM)William the Grave Robber Wrote:(25-03-2026, 04:20 PM)PradaĀ theĀ Seamstress Wrote: Some very fine examples here @Laura the Lace MistressYes, but you're on the same team, so you've already ok'd it in your back room
I don't think we are.
(25-03-2026, 04:50 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote:(25-03-2026, 04:23 PM)William the Grave Robber Wrote: Yes, but you're on the same team, so you've already ok'd it in your back room
I don't think we are.
She's after my HOT HUSBAND @William the Grave Robber, temptress that she is.
(25-03-2026, 04:50 PM)LauraĀ theĀ LaceĀ Mistress Wrote:(25-03-2026, 04:23 PM)WilliamĀ theĀ GraveĀ Robber Wrote: Yes, but you're on the same team, so you've already ok'd it in your back room
I don't think we are.
What do you think about my theory that someone in contention for a prize on day one received a prize and eliminating those now dead and those whose prizes were verified by Lorcan leaves us with Friar, Betty and yourself?
If you are faithful as you state you are then Friar Tuck is the only one who could have received that prize
(25-03-2026, 03:29 PM)FriarĀ Tuck Wrote:(25-03-2026, 03:25 PM)BettyĀ theĀ Beggar Wrote:It may just be me but @Betty the Beggar your last two posts are black text on dark grey and very difficult to read. It doesn't appear to be happening on anyone else's posts, @lorcand1990 maybe you can advise if ther eis something one of us needs to change?
Is it just me who read this in the accent of an eastern european lady of the night?
Right so............
I'm in work, so I wrote those two in word and just copy and pasted them over, noted for the next time
An insta banishment has been used! A player will be leaving the castle immediately
@Prada the Seamstress you have been banished from the game.
Please reveal now if you are a Faithful or a Traitor
Please reveal now if you are a Faithful or a Traitor
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

