The Rookie Werewolf - Game Thread
(20-04-2026, 08:42 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote:(20-04-2026, 07:54 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: Reading the initial aftermath of the failed kidnapping, I feel Dora posted a few times in rapid succession after being more lax during the day. A few people (Marki, Moe and Amy specifically) were trying to discuss the kidnapping who have been relatively active, and maybe it's just a case of Dora seeing something she can talk about (without having to start launching accusations) but it does feel it triggered a little bit of engagement.Amy was on the thread but didn't discuss the failed kidnapping. In order it was me, Countess, Moe, Edward, Dexter, Benji, Dora, Jester, Jacob, Kevin, Vincent and Ina who discussed it.
Which makes me wonder if it was someone panicking a bit after their power failed and were trying to figure out why.
7 posts over Saturday, Sunday & Monday. 5 posts right after the kidnapping.
Why would you say 'Marki, Moe and Amy specifically' discussed it when it's clearly false?
"False" is a bit strong, given you're confirming Marki and Moe were discussing it immediately after it happened. Fair enough about Amy, you're right. When I was reading back to make the point about Dora, I noticed Amy was posting at the same time, but re-reading, she wasn't actually talking about the kidnapping. Should have read closer.
"Is this just your second game? After playing traitors last time? Think you said earlier you're new?"
I didn't play Traitors. I *think* it was Amy who said she had? I've played similiar games with friends but never played werewolf on here.
(20-04-2026, 08:56 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote:Yeah, I saw that alright 😂 tbf, I did say that I'd shoot a low poster and he was just an example of one(20-04-2026, 08:51 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote: Folks, just back on now, anyone able to share the current state of play?You want to shoot the games mods.
(20-04-2026, 09:03 PM)Vincent the Artist Wrote:I answered that earlier too. Ina had been called out already by Amy(20-04-2026, 08:50 PM)Moe the Innkeeper Wrote: Well yeah I said they were at the top of my list earlier today after a bit of back and forth with them and they've been fairly absent since. Haven't offered anything so why would I change
Didn't you say you were gonna come back this evening with some reads?
Or is it because I pointed out a glaringly obvious hole on your post where you called me out as a one post wonder but failed to mention the other?
As I said earlier, I would be back on the thread tonight which I am. Not posting as much/often as you believe I should be does not make me wolf.
(20-04-2026, 08:56 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote:Yeah, I saw that alright 😂 tbf, I did say I'd shoot a low poster and he just happened to be one of the lowest(20-04-2026, 08:51 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote: Folks, just back on now, anyone able to share the current state of play?You want to shoot the games mods.
(20-04-2026, 09:08 PM)Moe the Innkeeper Wrote:(20-04-2026, 09:03 PM)Vincent the Artist Wrote: Or is it because I pointed out a glaringly obvious hole on your post where you called me out as a one post wonder but failed to mention the other?I answered that earlier too. Ina had been called out already by Amy
As I said earlier, I would be back on the thread tonight which I am. Not posting as much/often as you believe I should be does not make me wolf.
That doesn't fit the narrative of your post at the time. You weren't calling me out. You were suss because I was a one post wonder, but not suss of Ina.
So did I. Was it not a joke?
What do you all think of Amy and Lilly?
I'd read the failed actions as the wolves trying to recruit and then trying to kill. The responding officer was the same both time, don't know if that's significant or not
Based off not much, I'll probably vote for William for his negative opening post and an earlier post about killing the priest wolf first
Vote going in now
Based off not much, I'll probably vote for William for his negative opening post and an earlier post about killing the priest wolf first
Vote going in now
I have voted Mick. There is no content in his posts where he has any suspicions etc of any player, but is a very helpful poster in his posts.
That's all I have to go on right now because I'm getting a lot of errors in trying to even just read posts all evening.
I am also suss of Jacob.
That's all I have to go on right now because I'm getting a lot of errors in trying to even just read posts all evening.
I am also suss of Jacob.
(20-04-2026, 06:03 PM)Lieutenant Grey Wrote: 7-Lincoln-200 to 7-Adam-19, Attempted kidnapping in your vicinity in progress.
7-Adam-19 show responding
……
…
.
7-Adam-19 to 7-Lincoln-200. Arrived just on time, bit of a fist fight, perp has fled the scene, No ID, victim is fine.
(20-04-2026, 08:35 PM)Magda the Maid Wrote: From the game rules
5) Game starts with Saturday & Sunday considered as an extended Day 1, with the first Yeet/Lynch at 9.30pm Monday Evening (some role actions may take place prior to this on Monday only, no actions will take place on the Sunday). After 9.30pm Monday will be considered night 1. Set time for Munch is 10am & for Yeet/Lynch is 9.30pm. This game will operate an open night phase.
This part in bold could indicate it was a night time activity from Sunday maybe rolled over as Sunday was day 1, hence the Monday only line. Kidnappnig Could be SK still?
Is it only Monday for day stuff so you think the way it's written or it can be day stuff from Mon on only?
I'm not sure who to vote for. William maybe or Vincent. I agree whoever said friar comes across good. Has Ina posted since her initial post? I'm in my phone so it's harder to check
Vote in at 21:14 on William.
I think it's suss to have called out low posters in his first post and then go on to make a series of posts in what looks like an attempt to move up in the posting stats. I didn't see a lot of substance in many of them.
He also suggested up to 9 players in that opening post and added in another two with who he might peek. That's 11 of 19 players (excluding himself). It's a scattergun approach which could be an attempt to draw people out but that would ring truer for me if came after more engagement on thread rather than from the outset.
I think it's suss to have called out low posters in his first post and then go on to make a series of posts in what looks like an attempt to move up in the posting stats. I didn't see a lot of substance in many of them.
He also suggested up to 9 players in that opening post and added in another two with who he might peek. That's 11 of 19 players (excluding himself). It's a scattergun approach which could be an attempt to draw people out but that would ring truer for me if came after more engagement on thread rather than from the outset.
Vote in for Lilly, very little substance and very few posts.
(20-04-2026, 09:13 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote: I'd read the failed actions as the wolves trying to recruit and then trying to kill. The responding officer was the same both time, don't know if that's significant or not
Based off not much, I'll probably vote for William for his negative opening post and an earlier post about killing the priest wolf first
Vote going in now
I don't get the reasoning for thinking both actions are wolf actions based on the responding officer. It doesn't really line up with the roles described in the OP that the wolves could do both actions IMO.
seems like there is a hefty enough william wagon going on
I voted earlier for Ina May not much posting and her interaction with Moe seems off.
(20-04-2026, 09:20 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote:My opinion that they're wolf actions and the same responding officer aren't linked. I'm thinking though that it could have been the same player targeted(20-04-2026, 09:13 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote: I'd read the failed actions as the wolves trying to recruit and then trying to kill. The responding officer was the same both time, don't know if that's significant or not
Based off not much, I'll probably vote for William for his negative opening post and an earlier post about killing the priest wolf first
Vote going in now
I don't get the reasoning for thinking both actions are wolf actions based on the responding officer. It doesn't really line up with the roles described in the OP that the wolves could do both actions IMO.
(20-04-2026, 08:47 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote: I read back on the thread earlier and the posters who I took note of as not contributing as much in terms of dissecting wolf roles or figuring out what is going on were Boris, Dora, Gordon, Ina May, Vincent and William.I see where you’re coming from Markie. I mentioned in a previous post that I haven’t played in a long time. There’s a lot to get your head around. I don’t have the experience to be coming up with lots of theories. The double failure was one I could clearly see, and was able to contribute my opinion on.
There was a bit more engagement with the two failed actions but they are easy enough things to comment on. Not sure were my vote will land tonight, there's very little information to go on, but it will likely be amongst the six I mentioned unless there is a decent wagon alternative.
I'm going to vote for William. Not a great vote, but I don't see much reasoning in his posts, and one of his posts after the failed shooting struck me as soemone not thinking about the roles that were discussed on thread.
Voting closes in less than ten minutes. Y'all might wanna drop the donuts and vote if you haven't already
Submitted vote for William at 21:25.
(20-04-2026, 09:13 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote: I'd read the failed actions as the wolves trying to recruit and then trying to kill. The responding officer was the same both time, don't know if that's significant or notHow was Williams opening post negative? You getting mixed up??
Based off not much, I'll probably vote for William for his negative opening post and an earlier post about killing the priest wolf first
Vote going in now
It was a lazy read in my opinion.
Vote in for William
(20-04-2026, 09:23 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote:(20-04-2026, 08:47 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote: I read back on the thread earlier and the posters who I took note of as not contributing as much in terms of dissecting wolf roles or figuring out what is going on were Boris, Dora, Gordon, Ina May, Vincent and William.I see where you’re coming from Markie. I mentioned in a previous post that I haven’t played in a long time. There’s a lot to get your head around. I don’t have the experience to be coming up with lots of theories. The double failure was one I could clearly see, and was able to contribute my opinion on.
There was a bit more engagement with the two failed actions but they are easy enough things to comment on. Not sure were my vote will land tonight, there's very little information to go on, but it will likely be amongst the six I mentioned unless there is a decent wagon alternative.
Well, I'm not voting for you tonight and it doesn't seem like others are from what is posted, so you can redeem yourself later.
too late now with the amounts of votes, but why is everyone voting him?
(20-04-2026, 09:22 PM)Weyland the Blacksmith Wrote:(20-04-2026, 09:20 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote: I don't get the reasoning for thinking both actions are wolf actions based on the responding officer. It doesn't really line up with the roles described in the OP that the wolves could do both actions IMO.My opinion that they're wolf actions and the same responding officer aren't linked. I'm thinking though that it could have been the same player targeted
I don't see the logic in that. I think the mod flair for specific outcomes is already largely written and not tailored to specific characters.
VOTING CLOSED
I agree CM. Not the same Modus Operandi either. Shooting sounds more like the vig.
Wesley here on the Lieutenants Call-sign. 7-Lincoln-200 to all units. As you know, the Mayor is giving a talk to the Captain in the Roll-Call room, so you have all been voting on the fly.
Ltnt Grey and I have been tallying the votes and we have called @William the Grave Robber into the Station. 7-Lincoln-200 out”
“7-Adam-30 responding, situation ongoing, @William the Grave Robber has gone crazy! Shots fired!”
“7-Adam-98 attaching to call, we have visual of suspect, public in danger, what is the order”
“7-Lincoln-200 responding, take suspect down.”
…..
“7-Adam-30 to 7-Lincoln-200. Suspect has been hit, and is now deceased. En route to morgue”
Ltnt Grey and I have been tallying the votes and we have called @William the Grave Robber into the Station. 7-Lincoln-200 out”
“7-Adam-30 responding, situation ongoing, @William the Grave Robber has gone crazy! Shots fired!”
“7-Adam-98 attaching to call, we have visual of suspect, public in danger, what is the order”
“7-Lincoln-200 responding, take suspect down.”
…..
“7-Adam-30 to 7-Lincoln-200. Suspect has been hit, and is now deceased. En route to morgue”
Do we get a vote tally? I hate games with no vote tally.
In fairness that username was always going to cause him issues!
No autopriest yet, so not the wolf priest.
Voting Results Night 1:
The following 3 users thanked this post:
• Vincent the Artist, Benjamin the Alchemist, Magda the Maid
• Vincent the Artist, Benjamin the Alchemist, Magda the Maid
Ok that was a runaway wagon.
Users browsing this thread: 11 Invisible User(s), 3 Guest(s)

