The Traitors- Boards/FOG Edition

[Donald the Spoofer]

This is bullsh*t, I'm out too. Faithful obvs

How you mean you are out?

[Rhoda the Spinster]

I was thinking of voting Gordon, probably went on the general views but then he posted defending me as a newbie against Rhonda.

I knew he was a faithful then.

Sorry to see you go.

You need to see beyond yourself and stop being defensive. Voting for people as payback for them noticing behaviours as suspicious is counterproductive. You hadn't a chance to read todays thread, I suggest you do that and start looking at what is actually suspicious.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

Another faithful gone! There better be married traitors as well.

[Weyland the Blacksmith]

This is bullsh*t, I'm out too. Faithful obvs

Players..

I really didn't think it would come to this, but it appears that Gordon the Cook's wife @Ina May the Midwife has stormed out of the castle in protest of her husband being eliminated

As you can see, Ina May was a Faithful

Christ almighty

[Donald the Spoofer]

This is bullsh*t, I'm out too. Faithful obvs

Players..

I really didn't think it would come to this, but it appears that Gordon the Cook's wife @Ina May the Midwife has stormed out of the castle in protest of her husband being eliminated

As you can see, Ina May was a Faithful

Gordon must be a great cook

[McDonald the Farmer]

What’s the husband a wife bit about?

[McDonald the Farmer]

Can we have some guns, please?

[Friar Tuck]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

[Rhoda the Spinster]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

It was part of the game. They are twinned players. When one dies the other is out too. It's a game mechanic called the lovers.

[Donald the Spoofer]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

Seems like part of the game as Gordon mentioned his missus during his reveal

[Countess Markievicz]

I was thinking of voting Gordon, probably went on the general views but then he posted defending me as a newbie against Rhonda.

I knew he was a faithful then.

Sorry to see you go.

You need to see beyond yourself and stop being defensive. Voting for people as payback for them noticing behaviours as suspicious is counterproductive. You hadn't a chance to read todays thread, I suggest you do that and start looking at what is actually suspicious.

Spoken like a true traitor. Ah no in all seriousness, it's fair to call out my lack of posting but I had to defend myself somewhat. I take your point but will have to disagree. 

Once Gordon stepped up to defend me at least as a faithful I knew he wasnt a traitor as he defended me.

[Friar Tuck]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

It was part of the game. They are twinned players. When one dies the other is out too. It's a game mechanic called the lovers.

Ok, I hadn't heard about twinning players like that, that sucks for Ina!!

[Rhoda the Spinster]

You need to see beyond yourself and stop being defensive. Voting for people as payback for them noticing behaviours as suspicious is counterproductive. You hadn't a chance to read todays thread, I suggest you do that and start looking at what is actually suspicious.

Spoken like a true traitor. Ah no in all seriousness, it's fair to call out my lack of posting but I had to defend myself somewhat. I take your point but will have to disagree. 

Once Gordon stepped up to defend me at least as a faithful I knew he wasnt a traitor as he defended me.

That makes no sense. Faithfuls don't know who other faithfuls are, how does anyone defending you prove their alignment.

[Friar Tuck]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

Seems like part of the game as Gordon mentioned his missus during his reveal

I did wonder what that was about when I read it

[William the Grave Robber]

So 15 players left, assuming Lily is mod killed for missed vote.

So is it 12v3 or 11v4?
A kill tonight will leave it 11v3 or 10v4

Even worse odds now

[Countess Markievicz]

Spoken like a true traitor. Ah no in all seriousness, it's fair to call out my lack of posting but I had to defend myself somewhat. I take your point but will have to disagree. 

Once Gordon stepped up to defend me at least as a faithful I knew he wasnt a traitor as he defended me.

That makes no sense. Faithfuls don't know who other faithfuls are, how does anyone defending you prove their alignment.

 A traitor is unlikely to be defending a faithful.

[McDonald the Farmer]

Was that the balancing thing that was introduced today?

[William the Grave Robber]

Was that the balancing thing that was introduced today?

I hope not, we lost another faithful!

[Chris the Carpenter]

I'm a bit confused about whether this was @Ina May the Midwife 's decision or part of the game?!

Seems like part of the game as Gordon mentioned his missus during his reveal

I didn't see that one coming,  where are we going to go from here it's a disaster.

[lorcand1990]

Players, you have banished two of your own tonight. What's more, you have lost another faithful in the crossfire.

The bad news doesn't end there. As per the rules I have no choice but to remove @Lilly the Millennial from the game, due to 2 missed votes. Lilly was a Faithful.

You need to regroup tonight & try again tomorrow. Unfortunately, the Traitors get to strike next, as they have the chance to murder tonight.

Thread will close at 11pm. Sweet dreams

[William the Grave Robber]

That makes no sense. Faithfuls don't know who other faithfuls are, how does anyone defending you prove their alignment.

 A traitor is unlikely to be defending a faithful.

Traitor will happily defend a faithful when needed to pocket them as you have perfectly illustrated how it can work

[Boris the Fool]

That makes no sense. Faithfuls don't know who other faithfuls are, how does anyone defending you prove their alignment.

 A traitor is unlikely to be defending a faithful.

I don’t know about that - it would be a good cover

[Countess Markievicz]

 A traitor is unlikely to be defending a faithful.

Traitor will happily defend a faithful when needed to pocket them as you have perfectly illustrated how it can work

Anything is possible but in this case Gordon was a faithful.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

That makes no sense. Faithfuls don't know who other faithfuls are, how does anyone defending you prove their alignment.

 A traitor is unlikely to be defending a faithful.

Why wouldn't they if it gets someone on side? Flattering someone and being agreeable is one of the easiest ways to skate by as a traitor.

What faithfuls need to do is ruffle feathers and look for traitors.

[William the Grave Robber]

Traitor will happily defend a faithful when needed to pocket them as you have perfectly illustrated how it can work

Anything is possible but in this case Gordon was a faithful.

In this case yes. But if he happened to be a traitor he had you pocketed, as you wouldn't have voted for him because he defended you.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

Hopefully this balancing comes into effect soon...

[Countess Markievicz]

Anything is possible but in this case Gordon was a faithful.

In this case yes. But if he happened to be a traitor he had you pocketed, as you wouldn't have voted for him because he defended you.

Indeed I get your point. I guess we can constantly have answers if we apply to same logic to everything we will never find a traitor.

[lorcand1990]

Bedtime, everyone. No Posting until 8am.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

Just catching up.
Magda murdered in plain sight.
Few questions, why Magda? Will look through her posts later to see who she interacted with.
How did they murder her? I'd have to go back and see who mentions her name in their posts, maybe traitors had to name her 3 times for example

RIP Amy

This is interesting. Was posted when we still thought Magda was the chosen victim of killed in plain sight. Hypothesised a mechanic where the traitors had to name someone three times.
My theory was that the traitors had to question someone three times in a row, based on Prada's weird post to Maeve.
Could be a coincidence, but no one else who is still alive has been posited as a likely killer for Maeve other than Prada. Odd that William mentions an oddly similar mechanic for possible Magda kill.

[William the Grave Robber]

Just catching up.
Magda murdered in plain sight.
Few questions, why Magda? Will look through her posts later to see who she interacted with.
How did they murder her? I'd have to go back and see who mentions her name in their posts, maybe traitors had to name her 3 times for example

RIP Amy

This is interesting. Was posted when we still thought Magda was the chosen victim of killed in plain sight. Hypothesised a mechanic where the traitors had to name someone three times.
My theory was that the traitors had to question someone three times in a row, based on Prada's weird post to Maeve.
Could be a coincidence, but no one else who is still alive has been posited as a likely killer for Maeve other than Prada. Odd that William mentions an oddly similar mechanic for possible Magda kill.

What's odd about what I said?

I could say isn't it odd that I put forward the naming someone 3 times, and you go on to suggest a similar mechanic later.
That I hypothesised how Pat could be indirectly involved in the murder in plain sight and you later posted something very similar.

That strikes me as more odd.

[William the Grave Robber]

Oh and good morning by the way😅

[Rhoda the Spinster]

This is interesting. Was posted when we still thought Magda was the chosen victim of killed in plain sight. Hypothesised a mechanic where the traitors had to name someone three times.
My theory was that the traitors had to question someone three times in a row, based on Prada's weird post to Maeve.
Could be a coincidence, but no one else who is still alive has been posited as a likely killer for Maeve other than Prada. Odd that William mentions an oddly similar mechanic for possible Magda kill.

What's odd about what I said?

I could say isn't it odd that I put forward the naming someone 3 times, and you go on to suggest a similar mechanic later.
That I hypothesised how Pat could be indirectly involved in the murder in plain sight and you later posted something very similar.

That strikes me as more odd.

I came up with a possible mechanic based on a post were someone interacted with Maeve who was  killed in plain sight. 
You postulated a very similar mechanic but no follow up as far as I can see with posts demonstrating such a mechanic. Might be a coincidence they are similar but I'm taking notes of it.

[William the Grave Robber]

I put forward a theory of being named 3 times and couldn't find evidence, so didn't go further with it.

The coincidence they are similar is more a reflection on you, as I've highlighted above, so thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Definitely something to keep an eye on with regard to your posts. Are you piggybacking on others posts to seem helpful, without having any original ideas of your own.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

I put forward a theory of being named 3 times and couldn't find evidence, so didn't go further with it.

The coincidence they are similar is more a reflection on you, as I've highlighted above, so thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Definitely something to keep an eye on with regard to your posts. Are you piggybacking on others posts to seem helpful, without having any original ideas of your own.

How am I piggybacking?
When I looked at Prada's post towards Meave I noticed the odd phrasing and highlighted it. 
I only noticed your post this morning when reading back, and again highlighted it. 
Listening to other players is not piggybacking.

Who do you think is responsible for the murder in plain sight?

[McDonald the Farmer]

Morning all

[Donald the Spoofer]

Good morning folks

[Countess Markievicz]

Good morning all.

[William the Grave Robber]

If I knew that, I would consider myself good at this game and I would have let it be known by now.
I can't see anything obvious, so it may be a keyword that was used at some point.

I thought Pat might have been caught up in it with the mix up of names, hence my vote last night. Was wrong on that one obviously.

[William the Grave Robber]

Re the piggybacking. Let's call it a coincidence so that your posts were similar to mine.

[Rhoda the Spinster]

If I knew that, I would consider myself good at this game and I would have let it be known by now.
I can't see anything obvious, so it may be a keyword that was used at some point.

I thought Pat might have been caught up in it with the mix up of names, hence my vote last night. Was wrong on that one obviously.

So you don't think it's Prada? Why not?

We know Maeve was killed so it had to be someone. Why the reluctance to look at the possibilities.