(17-10-2025, 04:13 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote:(13-10-2025, 03:39 PM)Laura the Lace Mistress Wrote: First thought based on this in the OP:
"Avoid character reveals", how does this work is a RV is up for lynch? If they can't reveal we could end up lynching them. Am I missing something here? Can they say they have a role?
Thoughts on players
Betty - a lot of fluff and character posts, also spotted something there too
Rhoda - a lot of fluff
Ina - village lean here, not afraid to get stuck in
Benjamin - neutral lean, is posting and seems to be trying figure it out
Pat - I didn't read their post as suggesting there was only one wolf, he jad actually said 'more than one'. Very defensive when called on it or when others said he was suspicious. Later said Vernon didn't want discussion of wolf numbers, that's not true either. Not sure what to make of Pat.
Edward - nothing to go on here
Prada - village lean here
Vernon - must be a newish player as asked what pocketing is. Village lean here.
Frank - fluff
Magda - called out Wendy for the back room reference and Wendy for AI, later said Vernon pocketed Wendy. Village lean here.
Wendy - made a big deal of Pat's post when he clearly said likely more than one wolf. Lot of reaction testing, FFAed Betty, Prada and Magda. #57 said Betty is a provable load but didn't really explain it when asked by Prada, Betty and Vernon, I still don't understand the "making up a narrative" bit. AI no sense. Called Magda a WOLF!!!! Asked Benjamin to explain RVS and pocketing in their own words - don't see the point of this. Wolf lean here.
William - more fluff, spreadsheets, suss of Pat.
Mick - couple of posts today, spotted autopriest only being mentioned for lynch, asked Wendy why she expected flips for flavour kills this morning.
16 players, so agree on 3/4 wolves.
(17-10-2025, 02:18 PM)Rhoda the Spinster Wrote: Does three not seem low in the case of 16 original players? I don't know really.I'll be out for a few hours from around half 4, this list was my honest reads at the time when there was very little to go on. This is what everyone jumped on, but look at the first paragraph.
I mean the two we have killed (by default or otherwise) are not Sauruman nor Sauron. I don't know enough about LOTR- in my head Sauron was just the big eye thingy (it's been a while since I watched, and my son who read all the books is away), but I take it "he" was a character of sorts, not just a spirit/being. Therefore it would make sense that he features in some capacity. So Ben is Sauraman, let's say. And then is there a greater evil in Sauron?
It was my seventh post, Google my character with the number seven.
😂
Did any of you Google as Laura asked?
She’s taking the P out of you lads and rock solid evidence like this is what you’re pinning your hopes on!
🤣🤣🤣