(11-08-2025, 12:24 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.
That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.
(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: @Gordon the Cook
I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.
(11-08-2025, 01:49 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote:(11-08-2025, 01:44 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two?
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.
It was in response to Gordon's suggestion about how to declare votes without declaring votes to prevent a Cruella kill via tie. I liked the suggestion but am not married to it. I cant see the wolves orchestrating a tie but I can see them taking advantage of one that develops naturally.
(11-08-2025, 03:20 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote:(11-08-2025, 03:10 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Can you share a few of the notes from your ISO? Like you say you've ISO'd everyone & then just say Lilly & Ray are suspicious for those reasons
Give your read on me for example? Or anyone else.. I get it's D1 & all but would be interested to hear it
Am away from my computer so dont have my full notes handy but be back home in an hour and can give full details then.
My read on you was a bit spatty but not afraid to challenge and engaging with thread a lot. On Oprah I noted that I didn't really see what others were seeing in terms of sowing confusion but they were fixated on Cruella which they acknowledged themselves.
(11-08-2025, 05:48 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: Heading out in a few. Notes below.
Boris the Fool Bit spatty.Contributing. Sort of agree on the OTT thing. Engaged and challening people. Wouldn't vote here for now.
Countess Markievicz Measured. Unsure here. Not a lot of posts throughout the day. Doesn't feel like village game but they've been v quiet.
Dexter the Dragoon High poster. If wolf, Hans. Likely to draw munch or be peeked. Bit all over the place which makes me think village.
Dora the Explorer 1 Post but has done the maths. ISOd Friar Tuck. Why them? More posts today. Analysing with conclusions. If wolf, doing a lot of work. Not sure I agree on Dex but working. I'm on FFA but currently reading through my posts - cart before horse?
Friar Tuck Dora doesn't like posts but not seeing a lot here. Very low posting. Be good to hear more.
Gordon the Cook Mostly leaning good here. Observant and engaged. Putting thoughts out there.
Jacob the Tailor Exactly 5 posts yesterday. Tone reading - seems a bit stating the obvious. Bit off. Also says Oprah sowing confusion. Is this not echoing what Dex said? Collusion in BR?
Lilly the Millennial Unsure of opening post. Something a bit off there tonewise. Post about post counts. Spotted thing on powers thief. Quotes without names thing. Shoot @McD, peek @Dex. Quite defensive in responses today. Can't shake the tone being off.
McDonald the Farmer What's with the powers thief? I read it as apprentice. Seems to be just reading and reacting. Aggressive enough. Not sure about the just 2 on FFA thing. Overall neutral to village for me.
Moe the Innkeeper 1 Post but experienced enough. Limited posts today. Hard to get a read but asking questions and gave reads on readback. Again would like to hear more.
Oprah the Gossip Are they sowing confusion? Not sure I agree with that read. The are 'tunnelling' on Cruella - easy place to boost post counts. Defensive enough. One to watch.
Raymond the Shoemaker Paying attention, corrected Dex. Unfinished post? Says something v similar to Lily about wolf peeking good. Suggests discussions around vote tallying are OTT. Not against discussion but manner of it. Questions McD on Jacob veto. Definitely aware of what's happening but posts today read better tonewise.
(11-08-2025, 05:49 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: Based on my notes my #FFA:
Lily
Jacob
Countess M
I'm going to put my vote in for Lily.
(11-08-2025, 05:52 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote:(11-08-2025, 05:50 PM)Jacob the Tailor Wrote: Im curious, why me second?
It's a tone reading thing. Feels like forced sincerity. Largely gut and vote hasn't gone for you.
If the best you’ve got is me mentioning Hans peeking good that’s like accusing me for saying good morning for an opening post on D0. It’s standard, it’s nothing. Also, I have looked back and more than 2 players mentioned the peek good wolf, so passing that of as fact is disingenuous.
You haven't engaged with me at all, and yet you are reading my "tone." Tone reads are pure gut and subjective — and my tone here is exactly how I play village when we’ve got nothing but scraps on D1.
What is wolfy is ISO’ing everyone, claiming ‘unsure’ on the majority, and then planting suspicion on two easy targets without pushing anywhere risky. That’s the kind of safe shade a wolf throws when they don’t want to be caught.