Disney Classics Werewolf

[Moe the Innkeeper]

Can you expand on this, I don't understand what you mean here, it might just be me but it's confusing me what you are trying to say

with no flavour munch today, we would lynch someone tonight for no reason. 
that makes the village the bad guys.

now, with the flavour munch, we have a reason to lynch someone

Can you explain this? A flavour munch is a standard mechanic used to allow all players have some game time.

@Gordon the Cook, why did you ask what a flavour munch is? Have you not played a Boards game before?

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.

Amy didn't post the ISO's

Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Can you expand on this part please, what else did you notice

On mobile and finding it hard with all the multi quotes to keep track of poster on header. She said she ISOd Lilly and me so thought all the multi quotes were her. Don't want to say what I noticed as I've done enough damage, but it was a query regarding a village role.

[Lilly the Millennial]

@Boris the Fool gave my take on jafar and cruella early on. Don't necessarily have any other insights on the OP as others have essentially fleshed things out. I thought it was generally straightforward tbh. It's what's not in the OP I'm weary about haha.

On the conversation around vote declaration. Fully understand the arguement about RV self pres. Which is definitely very valid. I like the idea of general ideas of where people are voting, rather than declarative votes for this specific tie problem we have. Imo, a blind tie is way less likely to happen than a declared vote tie. Groups of wolves or individuals could potentially turn a clear wagon into a 2way race for a tie.

Although now that I've written that out I'm thinking the post lynch record could potentially out them if they did something like that. So now I don't know lol

Could you explain to me how a declared vote tie is likely to happen?

I think I basically said your last line already anyway earlier. If we are declaring votes, any wolf declaring will need to vote where they say they are intending. So say wolf 1 says they will vote Boris, but ends up voting Gordon to create a tie, they look outrageously wolfy

A blind vote is just that, could go any way

Did I single out Moe? That's another thing you've gotten wrong this morning

You're arguing semantics here and you know it, just to throw a bit of shade. 👍 Have at it, at least have the decency to back up your "decisions" with actual reasonings instead of just trying to turn it into a question to someone else.. saying they have offered nothing so you should shoot them at 11am on a Monday cause they have had 1 post.. is fuckin iffy.. why not actually look into other people's posts and find some actual reasonings..

Nope, I'd shoot the low posters without giving them a chance.

@Boris the Fool a bit hypocritical here, you called me hypocritical for not giving reasons for my shoot/peek, and then drop your own picks with very weak reasons, and then done playing it when called out on it. 

You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

Nope, I don't throw shade at people for making mistakes, I was just letting you know it was Amy that posted it, I've said all I need to say so I don't see the need to continue to reply and saying the same stuff over and over

Unless it's throwing shade my way for making a mistake 😝

Morning All,
I see numbers are slightly against village initially here.
Haven't played a game on FOG before, but I see any site that doesn't jump around and isn't filled with ads as a win.
I'm not seeing anything different about the OP than what has been posted already. Let's see how it plays out.

One of the quieter Sunday threads to read compared to recent times. Little to nothing happening.

Time to get the Disney party started and in keeping with the theme, Frozen being my movie of choice.

Snowball=Shoot=Lilly
Melt=peek=Dexter

Is it to mess with your head more! Nah
Is it because Friar the Tuck doesn't like millenials? Nah
Is it because I haven't liked your posting so far? Yes

C'mon Oprah, you've got a name to live up to. Let's get to gossiping about who you'd shoot?

I'd be happy to see Oprah to disappear off to Neverneverland too

@Friar Tuck Why do you not like Oprah?

Not a huge fan of Friars posting so far, initial post very early saying there isnt much to be added to the OP discussion seems odd.

Comes back later in the evening to say the thread has been quiet, fair enough but hasnt exactly added to the thread himself with his second post when he says this. Most of sunday conversation is usually around the OP and he obviously had nothing to add.

Calls out Lily as not liking her posts without being specific.

Fires at Oprah for no specific reasoning either.

In summary, random accusations with no substance, low engagement. Wolfy behaviour IMO

I'm also not liking @Friar Tuck posting style, I know they have called me out but the reasoning just isn't there. It seems to be just "because I say so." 

Looking at Lily from the slightly chattier players

First 2 posts mentions head being wrecked by wolf peeking good & by a players name

3rd post interaacting with a newbie, fair enough

4th post, a bit more to it. Calls out McDonald in relation to a post about Jafar. Messes up the qutoes & makes a few jokey posts about that

After that theres more interaction with a newbie... then a post on who hasn't checked in

Then they ask Friar for a reason why they are shooting at them, but doesn't give a reason of their own for shooting McDonald till I ask.. Then a post saying they clarified a poisition & didn't vanish... Funnily enough haven't heard from them since!!

I went to bed, and I've been at work all morning. I'm playing catch-up on lunch right now, but once I'm back at 2pm, I'll probably be offline again until 7ish. 

But as above, you did something similar yourself today. 

You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

how did you quote just dexter, without the other quotes?

do you have to actively delete posts when replying?

This is how I messed up my quoting yesterday. I tried to delete some of the thread and deleted way too much. 

Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.

I don't know what is standard most games these days. I have played in the past, but not for a long time. 
Emphasise is a bit of a stretch too - my observation is there to call out we can't fully trust seer peeks.

[Gordon the Cook]

with no flavour munch today, we would lynch someone tonight for no reason. 
that makes the village the bad guys.

now, with the flavour munch, we have a reason to lynch someone

Can you explain this? A flavour munch is a standard mechanic used to allow all players have some game time.

@Gordon the Cook, why did you ask what a flavour munch is? Have you not played a Boards game before?

I sure have, probably about 6 or 7 maybe. I'm out of the game a long time, and I wasn't sure exactly what it meant. Also don't remember ever being in a game with a flavor munch as the first action before. Something I'll have to check.

[Amy the Singer]

@Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

[Gordon the Cook]

Reading back over thread.

Thoughts so far. Most likely village, Dexter, Mc, Boris and Jacob.
Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.
Vincent and Zeena newbies so not in consideration for tonight but I don't think would be anyway.

Neutral on Friar and Dora.

Didn't like Oprah harassing a newbie, it's not fair to someone finding their feet. Not sure it's enough for me to vote there.

Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Gordon don't like. Seems overdramatic and a lot of hot air. I don't understand an experienced player talking about not declaring votes, this always helps with wagonomics, if declared votes don't match actual votes post lynch. I also thought they spent too long on this topic, just seemed like posting for no real benefit. Also the anti Boris tone seemed a bit strong on day one with nothing to go on.

Don't know why you wouldn't understand it, I've laid my thoughts out clearly the whole time. I'm worried the wolves will be able to manipulate us too easily with and use Cruella's power to do heavy damage. 

Admittedly, I'm not the best player, or the wisest. Which is why I share my thoughts on thread so that people can discuss and explain why or why not...

I'm still of the mind that an all out declaration may be more of a benefit to the wolves than the village, but I'm happy to go with consensus regardless.

[Boris the Fool]

@Lilly the Millennial

It pinged at the time to me cause you asked someone why shoot you but didn't give reasons of your own.. that is a fact... call my reasonings weak or whatever but if you ask someone for a reason why they would shoot you, then proceed in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd

Looks like you're just calling out players who call you out, like me and friar tuck

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Nope, I don't throw shade at people for making mistakes, I was just letting you know it was Amy that posted it, I've said all I need to say so I don't see the need to continue to reply and saying the same stuff over and over

Unless it's throwing shade my way for making a mistake 😝

Nope, no shade thrown yesterday, I called you out directly, nothing shady about that 😜

[Lilly the Millennial]

@Lilly the Millennial

It pinged at the time to me cause you asked someone why shoot you but didn't give reasons of your own.. that is a fact... call my reasonings weak or whatever but if you ask someone for a reason why they would shoot you, then proceed in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd

Looks like you're just calling out players who call you out, like me and friar tuck

No I was just responding to posts that specifically mentioned me in my catch up, or I felt needed a reply. I haven't done my FFA yet, I'm still thinking about it.

Also I don't find it odd, I replied like with like, looking for a bit of a reaction. It's odd it came from you though.

[Gordon the Cook]

The difference in playing here compared to boards is unreal. I can actually just catch up and post without losing my bloody marbles at the stupid scroll and infuriating quoting.

It's refreshing to be able to only be infuriated by the game and not the platform hahaha

[Dexter the Dragoon]

@Gordon the Cook decent long post, I've already declared my vote, so no point in me putting 2 players there now. If that's what everyone agrees on, I will do that going forward. I'll post FFA later on when I get home

[Boris the Fool]

Where i am atm:

Id remove Moe from my choices this morning and add lilly

Then yeah id wanna hear more from Oprah this afternoon as I get why theres suspicion there from what a few others have said

Gordon is down my suspicions list at the moment, definitely not sure here but they seem more flustered which comes across as genuine. Still on my radar though

Would still like to hear more from jacob

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

@Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

[Friar Tuck]

I don’t dislike Oprah for the record. She posted who she would peek but didn't for shoot. I don't like that. There's no discussion created. So I asked her directly and she has yet to respond.

Re. Lilly. Didn't like the initial posts and don't like the defensive posts afterwards either.

As of now my vote will go somewhere here.

If i see something I dont like I'll question it. Of you want to know something Lilly, ask away and I'll answer

[Zeena Warrior Princess]

Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

[Lilly the Millennial]

Where i am atm:

Id remove Moe from my choices this morning and add lilly

Then yeah id wanna hear more from Oprah this afternoon as I get why theres suspicion there from what a few others have said

Gordon is down my suspicions list at the moment,  definitely not sure here but they seem more flustered which comes across as genuine. Still on my radar though

Would still like to hear more from jacob

And your reasoning for me? Is it just because I called you out?

[Boris the Fool]

@Lilly the Millennial

It pinged at the time to me cause you asked someone why shoot you but didn't give reasons of your own.. that is a fact... call my reasonings weak or whatever but if you ask someone for a reason why they would shoot you, then proceed in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd

Looks like you're just calling out players who call you out, like me and friar tuck

No I was just responding to posts that specifically mentioned me in my catch up, or I felt needed a reply. I haven't done my FFA yet, I'm still thinking about it.

Also I don't find it odd, I replied like with like, looking for a bit of a reaction. It's odd it came from you though.

Its odd that you mentioned me in your post and I replied? Is that what the last paragraph means?

[Amy the Singer]

@Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

It was in response to Gordon's suggestion about how to declare votes without declaring votes to prevent a Cruella kill via tie. I liked the suggestion but am not married to it. I cant see the wolves orchestrating a tie but I can see them taking advantage of one that develops naturally.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

@Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

If you don't understand why the time then you haven't read the OP fully. Start there and you will understand

[Lilly the Millennial]

I don’t dislike Oprah for the record. She posted who she would peek but didn't for shoot. I don't like that. There's no discussion created. So I asked her directly and she has yet to respond.

Re. Lilly. Didn't like the initial posts and don't like the defensive posts afterwards either.

As of now my vote will go somewhere here.

If i see something I dont like I'll question it. Of you want to know something Lilly, ask away and I'll answer

Why is being defensive a bad thing? I'm not a wolf or SK, so pointing out flaws in people's logic is bad? 
I asked your for your initial reasoning and your answer was just because basically. That's not an answer. 
Your 6 contributions to date haven't been stellar you know.

[Lilly the Millennial]

No I was just responding to posts that specifically mentioned me in my catch up, or I felt needed a reply. I haven't done my FFA yet, I'm still thinking about it.

Also I don't find it odd, I replied like with like, looking for a bit of a reaction. It's odd it came from you though.

Its odd that you mentioned me in your post and I replied? Is that what the last paragraph means?

No. You said
[Quote]
in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd
[\quote]
I said it's odd the answer came from you and not Tuck. It was like you were coming in to his defense.

[Boris the Fool]

Where i am atm:

Id remove Moe from my choices this morning and add lilly

Then yeah id wanna hear more from Oprah this afternoon as I get why theres suspicion there from what a few others have said

Gordon is down my suspicions list at the moment,  definitely not sure here but they seem more flustered which comes across as genuine. Still on my radar though

Would still like to hear more from jacob

And your reasoning for me? Is it just because I called you out?

No i did a little iso on you earlier and didn't really like what was there

Aside from calling out Mcdonald most of your posts now are reactionary. At least your on fighting though so I'll give you some points for that

[Friar Tuck]

I said i dont like the defensiveness. It's not an indicator of being bad though.
I gave my reason, my read off your initial posts seemed off. Can't give anything more specific and am not going to make something up.

Your opinion is they aren't stellar. I've only posted sparingly but am happy with the purpose they've served.

[Boris the Fool]

Its odd that you mentioned me in your post and I replied? Is that what the last paragraph means?

No. You said

in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd
[\quote]
I said it's odd the answer came from you and not Tuck. It was like you were coming in to his defense.

Ok but my whole initial point was that you didn't give a reason until asked. You mentioned me in the post so I answered. It was relating to me

[Lilly the Millennial]

And your reasoning for me? Is it just because I called you out?

No i did a little iso on you earlier and didn't really like what was there

Aside from calling out Mcdonald most of your posts now are reactionary. At least your on fighting though so I'll give you some points for that

Your ISO seems to be just quoting my posts though/giving a summary. It doesn't give a reason for me to counter.
I admit they are reactionary because I am focusing on those calling me out? Am I not supposed to reply to those? Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

@Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

If you don't understand why the time then you haven't read the OP fully. Start there and you will understand

If the wolves use the declared votes to manipulate things to a tie that will just point suspicion at those wolves once the lynch votes are revealed. People giving two names will actually give the wolves more cover for hedging their bets if they think a teammate is in danger of lynch and they want to skew the other vote.
My feeling is people should either declare their vote or don't. Giving two possible votes just gives wolves cover.

[Boris the Fool]

No i did a little iso on you earlier and didn't really like what was there

Aside from calling out Mcdonald most of your posts now are reactionary. At least your on fighting though so I'll give you some points for that

Your ISO seems to be just quoting my posts though/giving a summary. It doesn't give a reason for me to counter.
I admit they are reactionary because I am focusing on those calling me out? Am I not supposed to reply to those? Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.

Fair enough I probably should've said in that post that aside from calling out Mcdonald you haven't really offered much

Thats true that now you're having to reply to those people calling you out. So who would be your top wolf picks?

[McDonald the Farmer]

Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

2. This is like a mine ffa, maybe we should downsize the ffa to 2 players.
that combines 1 & 2
ffa was originally designed to do what your 2 is attempting.
so maybe just 2 with reasoning, instead of 1 & 2.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

2. This is like a mine ffa, maybe we should downsize the ffa to 2 players.
that combines 1 & 2
ffa was originally designed to do what your 2 is attempting.
so maybe just 2 with reasoning, instead of 1 & 2.

And maybe post the FFA when you have voted, so that it can work as both a time declaration and a FFA

[McDonald the Farmer]

Reading back over thread.

Thoughts so far. Most likely village, Dexter, Mc, Boris and Jacob.
Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.
Vincent and Zeena newbies so not in consideration for tonight but I don't think would be anyway.

Neutral on Friar and Dora.

Didn't like Oprah harassing a newbie, it's not fair to someone finding their feet. Not sure it's enough for me to vote there.

Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Gordon don't like. Seems overdramatic and a lot of hot air. I don't understand an experienced player talking about not declaring votes, this always helps with wagonomics, if declared votes don't match actual votes post lynch. I also thought they spent too long on this topic, just seemed like posting for no real benefit. Also the anti Boris tone seemed a bit strong on day one with nothing to go on.

Don't know why you wouldn't understand it, I've laid my thoughts out clearly the whole time. I'm worried the wolves will be able to manipulate us too easily with and use Cruella's power to do heavy damage. 

Admittedly, I'm not the best player, or the wisest. Which is why I share my thoughts on thread so that people can discuss and explain why or why not...

I'm still of the mind that an all out declaration may be more of a benefit to the wolves than the village, but I'm happy to go with consensus regardless.

The only way we'll know if we are heading for a tie is by having declared votes. If its starting to look like we are heading for a tie, we can get people to change where they are voting, in order to ensure we don't accidentally tie. undeclared voting is a sure fire way to end up in an accidental tie. imho

[Dora the Explorer]

Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

Why wouldn't we just declare who we are voting on thread? I think saying you are voting for one of two will actually lead to more confusion and be impossible to track a possibility of a tie.


In the event of a close wagon we can discuss it and ask an online off wagon voter to add an additional safety vote if we have for example a 4v3 situation, im not a fan of your proposal.

FFAs should be done, I agree there

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

 To my mind people declaring two possible votes is the worst of all worlds. It reduces any potential wagonomics post lynch reveal, we could inadvertently get a tie because no one knows were the votes lie and the wolves get a nice cover if they switch votes to help a teammate. I get the declared timing thing helps a bit, but I still think this strategy will lead us scratching our heads post lynch.

[Amy the Singer]

I'm out tonight at the theatre (because Im fancy like that) and won't get a chance to switch my vote last minute. Giving a heads up early just in case.

[Dora the Explorer]

My thoughts from Sunday

Amy - First post just before 12, thanked post by Boris just before 4, no posts since

Friar - shoot peak game.. Has been started as both wolf and village so not alignment indicative

Boris - decent volume, asking questions openly discussing points. Niggly feeling about him. heightened with reply this morning, being reserved and not TOO pushy

McDonald - mix of aggressive questioning and helpful posts. Using posts to gauge reaction..

Oprah confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

Lilly little all over the place at the mo, will see how Monday goes, I did like their breakdown straight away - also see above, not a great response to that. (edited)

Countess M - lots of oneliners, bit if shade, bit of rules lawyering

Dora - one post saying they were coming back from hols and mechanics with numbers etc

Jacob put there neck out with conversions talk, could be a distraction or just Sunday musings. Brokedown the roles nicely

Vincent and Zeena - Newbies, not really  into the game yet

Gordon - Some nice posts, actively engaging, explaining (see pickle post) and not afraid to bite back

Current Post Count:


Total Posts: 149
User
# Posts
Boris the Fool
38
Dexter the Dragoon
36
Lilly the Millennial
12
McDonald the Farmer
10
Gordon the Cook
10
Countess Markievicz
9
Oprah the Gossip
8
Jacob the Tailor
5
Zeena Warrior Princess
5
Friar Tuck
4
Vincent the Artist
4
Amy the Singer
1
Dora the Explorer
1
Raymond the Shoemaker
1
Moe the Innkeeper
1


I'm on holidays (not away though boooo) this week and have loads of stuff on throughout the week with the kids starting in the afternoon today. I'll be trying to follow along and post as much as possible anyways.

Ok and read my post again.. I was going to smart arse reply you BUT you made a follow up post quickly after.. 0 point in doing that

And read that whole interaction from yesteday again, there was a way more important converstaion happening between us about Cruella and your 'fecked if we do and fecked if we don't' comment, which I mentioned at the time, so yeah that was my reply, rather than smart arsing you.. So I said why I think you are wrong, rather than brushing off a conversation with a silly reply... So how does that make me reserved again??

I've already said that I will be reading you in isolation so I will read that when I'm doing it.

FWIW I've liked the defending of your positioning.

I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

[Boris the Fool]

Ive said from the start I think the best way to avoid a tie is to declare who we are voting for

If we give 2 names and vote within there it leaves things open to chance

[Boris the Fool]

I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

I'll be interested to see what they come back with after they iso me like they said they would!

[McDonald the Farmer]

Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

Apart from one or two users who are posting loads of quotes for i don't really know why, I'm finding it quite refreshing to read.
A normal quote post will have have 2 nested quotes, so when reading a post, i read who it is from, and just skip over the quotes. If when reading the post, i want to see the context of the reply, i can read the person they were quoting, or just skim that for what they are talking about. and having the 1 extra nested quote means i can see the context of that post too, without having to leave the page.
I don't be rereading all the quotes all the time, just the posts themselves, and will refer to the quotes, only when i feel it is necessary. The number of times i have to leave the page to find context is reduce by having 2 nested quotes. imho. i like. but I'm on desktop atm, so that probably helps a lot.

[Dora the Explorer]

I'm out tonight at the theatre (because Im fancy like that) and won't get a chance to switch my vote last minute. Giving a heads up early just in case.

I'm out tonight at the theatre (because Im fancy like that) and won't get a chance to switch my vote last minute. Giving a heads up early just in case.

That is fine, once we know who you voted for, people online around lynch can move if we need to avoid a tie.

[Boris the Fool]

Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

At this stage it's very very difficult to know who is good & who is bad, as we really have no info to go on, other than people's posts

After the vote tonight we will learn more, depending on how it goes. We lynch someone & then we get told if they were village, wolf, or scar

[Boris the Fool]

Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.

Can you share a few of the notes from your ISO? Like you say you've ISO'd everyone & then just say Lilly & Ray are suspicious for those reasons

Give your read on me for example? Or anyone else.. I get it's D1 & all but would be interested to hear it