Disney Classics Werewolf

[Boris the Fool]

I find it funny, and mildly suspicious, that in your haste to jump all over me for that post, you didn't even read the very next post 😂🤔

Eh, you find it odd that i can't see the future, and react to things that have not happened yet?
You must be a precog.

Normally, i read, react, and then when a future post gets posted, i'll read that.

You get suspicious because somebody did not read something they have not read yet? 🤷‍♂️

Did your read of the post change after Dexters follow up?

[McDonald the Farmer]

Thanks @Necro!
Morning everyone!

In summary
Hans peeks good, which is a game mechanic that always messes with my head as no peek is trusted.
Jafar's fireball, could that be a one shot? Or more? Is it only successful on Aladdin? But it also says numerous powers so  possible Jack of all Trades?
Gaston should be taken out by some sort of bullet if we have that, because he will take someone else down with him.
Cruella decides on who goes if vote is tied. I don't know what to read into the"limitless".
Scar is serial Killer.
Simba is seer, Aladdin apprentice seer?
Hercules is bodyguard.
And possible other potential roles...

I like this post, helpful breakdown 

Could Cruella lynch two together if vote tied? Or is that too much? I'm thinking about limitless 

Yay for auto priest

nah, i think that's beyond the scope of plausible

[Vincent the Artist]

If any of the running theories on how expansive Cruella's powers are in a tie prove accurate (i.e. decision not limited to tied players or to just one in multiway tie) it seems best to do what we can to avoid that scenario

[McDonald the Farmer]

Am I right in thinking that a declared vote system would be honour based? As in we would only know if there's been a successful manipulation if the outcome doesn't match and even then we wouldn't necessarily know who pulled a switcheroo?

After the yeet/lynch, there will be a vote list showing exactly who voted whom etc. so switcheroos can be caught.

[McDonald the Farmer]

Eh, you find it odd that i can't see the future, and react to things that have not happened yet?
You must be a precog.

Normally, i read, react, and then when a future post gets posted, i'll read that.

You get suspicious because somebody did not read something they have not read yet? 🤷‍♂️

Did your read of the post change after Dexters follow up?

i dont know what this means.

[Oprah the Gossip]

Are you a wolf?

ditto at you oprah

No 

Are you?

[Gordon the Cook]

More like... 

Gordon right now



I'd shoot Boris, peek Boris, lynch Boris and 'whatever else is available' Boris. My new nemesis.

[Oprah the Gossip]

Maybe Cruella gives Necro her lynch target/targets before lynch in case of a tie or if it is a tie, is Cruella messaged about who they want to lynch before results revealed but what if not online, I'm concentrating on limitless Cruella too much

to me the limitless means her power will continue all game while she is alive.

2 tied votes....she picks which one
3 tied votes....she picks one.

i dont think if there are (say) 4 tied votes, she can choose to kill 3. 

though, there is enough ambiguity in the below that maybe she could kill 3 if 4 are tied. 

i suggest we try not to test that theory. 


Should there be a tied lynch, Cruella will decide who will live or die, and her choice will be… limitless

Her power continuing while alive would be a given, the limitless part is throwing me though, but her choosing to take out 2 or 3 lynch ties in one go would really be a big extra advantage to the wolves, so can't see that happening but her maybe choosing who to lynch if a tie from all players, could that be seen as limitless

[Dexter the Dragoon]

I find it funny, and mildly suspicious, that in your haste to jump all over me for that post, you didn't even read the very next post 😂🤔

Eh, you find it odd that i can't see the future, and react to things that have not happened yet?
You must be a precog.

Normally, i read, react, and then when a future post gets posted, i'll read that.

You get suspicious because somebody did not read something they have not read yet? 🤷‍♂️

That "future" post was posted straight after the initial one, probably within 20 seconds of it being posted. It had already happened when you replied to the post that you didn't like. It was directly under that post.. at the time... So gway with your bullshite about posts that hadn't been posted .

If you were reading, reacted, did you not go back and see the next post then? Why didn't you correct yourself? Instead you left a post taking it out of context completely.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

I can't get rid of the first quoted post here, I can't remember how so I'm leaving it 😂 but click here on the number for post counts.. if you then click on the number beside the user that shows up, you will get the ISO

Yep, always.. it's a new site to play on for many..

Do you have an issue with that?

possibly, we'll see. its just an easy way for wolves to get post count up

I don't think I'd need to be doing that to get my post count up 😂

[McDonald the Farmer]

Eh, you find it odd that i can't see the future, and react to things that have not happened yet?
You must be a precog.

Normally, i read, react, and then when a future post gets posted, i'll read that.

You get suspicious because somebody did not read something they have not read yet? 🤷‍♂️

That "future" post was posted straight after the initial one, probably within 20 seconds of it being posted. It had already happened when you replied to the post that you didn't like. It was directly under that post.. at the time... So gway with your bullshite about posts that hadn't been posted .

If you were reading, reacted, did you not go back and see the next post then? Why didn't you correct yourself? Instead you left a post taking it out of context completely.

I didn't like the post. i had not read the 2 subsequent posts before i replied, and i'm glad i didn't, as why reaction is raw, in the moment, from reading your "you're wrong" post, not you subsequent backing down and oh shit posts afterwards. you posted the post, you own it.
there is no take backsies in werewolf.

[Zeena Warrior Princess]

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

[McDonald the Farmer]

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

That was good advise, from whoever it was that said it. Get involved, chat, even pull a few thread out of other peoples jumpers if you see them dangling there. That is the best way to learn, and #1 rule, enjoy yourself while doing it.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

That "future" post was posted straight after the initial one, probably within 20 seconds of it being posted. It had already happened when you replied to the post that you didn't like. It was directly under that post.. at the time... So gway with your bullshite about posts that hadn't been posted .

If you were reading, reacted, did you not go back and see the next post then? Why didn't you correct yourself? Instead you left a post taking it out of context completely.

I didn't like the post. i had not read the 2 subsequent posts before i replied, and i'm glad i didn't, as why reaction is raw, in the moment, from reading your "you're wrong" post, not you subsequent backing down and oh shit posts afterwards. you posted the post, you own it.
there is no take backsies in werewolf.

I do own the post, and it was posted in jest, and even the person it was aimed at acknowledged that. It was in direct response to them saying something along the lines of "tell me I'm wrong". 

So I wrote "You're wrong"  then I followed up and there was a discussion.

Anyways, you are entitled to your opinion on that post, but you have read it totally wrong.

[McDonald the Farmer]

I didn't like the post. i had not read the 2 subsequent posts before i replied, and i'm glad i didn't, as why reaction is raw, in the moment, from reading your "you're wrong" post, not you subsequent backing down and oh shit posts afterwards. you posted the post, you own it.
there is no take backsies in werewolf.

I do own the post, and it was posted in jest, and even the person it was aimed at acknowledged that. It was in direct response to them saying something along the lines of "tell me I'm wrong". 

So I wrote "You're wrong"  then I followed up and there was a discussion.

Anyways, you are entitled to your opinion on that post, but you have read it totally wrong.

I like your reasoned responses. I'm going to move you from null to slightly town.
also, i never read stuff wrong. I always read stuff write, all the times!

[Oprah the Gossip]

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

Yes interact with everyone and that can include asking anyone are they a wolf , you'd never know a wolf might slip up , I wasn't picking on you as a newbie sorry if you felt that way

[Boris the Fool]

Did your read of the post change after Dexters follow up?

i dont know what this means.

Dexter followed up the post you quoted saying they were messing 

Did you find the original 'you are wrong post' to be less of an issue after you read their follow up posts, or did you still think it was dodgy?

[Boris the Fool]

More like... 

Gordon right now



I'd shoot Boris, peek Boris, lynch Boris and 'whatever else is available' Boris. My new nemesis.

Ok, you do you.. why though? Like go back and read our interactions,  all I did was ask for your opinion and you've gone a bit off the rails

Also, hyperfixating on one player is a bit of a cop out in  terms of giving reads on the game imo. Hopefully you move on from this today

[Boris the Fool]

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

That was good advise, from whoever it was that said it. Get involved, chat, even pull a few thread out of other peoples jumpers if you see them dangling there. That is the best way to learn, and #1 rule, enjoy yourself while doing it.

[Boris the Fool]

No Oprah, I'm not a wolf I'm a new player.

I was advised by others(think it was Boris but apologies if not!) the best way to learn game is interact with others.

God almighty your obviously not as helpful as others to new players to the game.

Yes interact with everyone and that can include asking anyone are they a wolf , you'd never know a wolf might slip up , I wasn't picking on you as a newbie sorry if you felt that way

Have you ever asked anyone 'are you a wolf' before and they have slipped up and said 'yes Oprah, im a big bad wolf... oops'

If anything along those lines has happened before id love to read it!

[Dexter the Dragoon]

@Boris the Fool I presume you are caught up on the thread now? Any further thoughts?

[Gordon the Cook]

More like... 

Gordon right now



I'd shoot Boris, peek Boris, lynch Boris and 'whatever else is available' Boris. My new nemesis.

Ok, you do you.. why though? Like go back and read our interactions,  all I did was ask for your opinion and you've gone a bit off the rails

Also, hyperfixating on one player is a bit of a cop out in  terms of giving reads on the game imo. Hopefully you move on from this today

I gave opinions before you asked. Then gave more.

Then you continued to prod me on the vote stuff, including asking me to explain something that is basic logic multiple times.

Then when I do explain it to you like you're an eejit as you requested, you act as if I'm the mad one for following through. 

Then to top it off, you come in with a condescending explanation to poke a hole in the theory that I had already called out myself in the original post, as if it hadn't happened. 

I was only messing with the nemesis thing, but after writing this out and reading back i think you're more of a Donald the Dodgy than a Boris the Fool.

[Boris the Fool]

@Boris the Fool I presume you are caught up on the thread now? Any further thoughts?

Yeah caught up and saw that Mcdonald has you slightly town now.  I had no issue with your post at the time, I read it as more of a joke than anything.  Was gonna smart ass reply you but you'd already made the follow up post by that stage 🤣

Anything else you'd like my thoughts on!? Any thoughts yourself?

[Dexter the Dragoon]

@Boris the Fool I presume you are caught up on the thread now? Any further thoughts?

Yeah caught up and saw that Mcdonald has you slightly town now.  I had no issue with your post at the time, I read it as more of a joke than anything.  Was gonna smart ass reply you but you'd already made the follow up post by that stage 🤣

Anything else you'd like my thoughts on!? Any thoughts yourself?

Disappointed you didnt do a smart arse reply. Not liking this. You are a high volume poster but that seems somewhat reserved.

Nothing else for now. I'll be posting my Sunday thoughts this morning once ive had a full read back.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Ok, you do you.. why though? Like go back and read our interactions,  all I did was ask for your opinion and you've gone a bit off the rails

Also, hyperfixating on one player is a bit of a cop out in  terms of giving reads on the game imo. Hopefully you move on from this today

I gave opinions before you asked. Then gave more.

Then you continued to prod me on the vote stuff, including asking me to explain something that is basic logic multiple times.

Then when I do explain it to you like you're an eejit as you requested, you act as if I'm the mad one for following through. 

Then to top it off, you come in with a condescending explanation to poke a hole in the theory that I had already called out myself in the original post, as if it hadn't happened. 

I was only messing with the nemesis thing, but after writing this out and reading back i think you're more of a Donald the Dodgy than a Boris the Fool.

I like this post. 

Now I'll have something fancy for breakfast thank you very much!

[Boris the Fool]

Yeah caught up and saw that Mcdonald has you slightly town now.  I had no issue with your post at the time, I read it as more of a joke than anything.  Was gonna smart ass reply you but you'd already made the follow up post by that stage 🤣

Anything else you'd like my thoughts on!? Any thoughts yourself?

Disappointed you didnt do a smart arse reply. Not liking this. You are a high volume poster but that seems somewhat reserved.

Nothing else for now. I'll be posting my Sunday thoughts this morning once ive had a full read back.

Meh, give me a chance to and I will. You had already covered it off quickly by saying it was a joke & mentioned nothing about having an issue with my reply until I brought up 'smart ass reply' right now

We had actual game discussion which I found more interesting at the time

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

Hi. Sorry for not posting yesterday, was a busy day.
From reading the OP and quick read of thread:
Han's peeks good. I hate this, it always makes me super paranoid.
Jafar: most powerful. The Aladdin fireball thing is interesting, is this flavour or is the fireball only useful if it hits Aladdin. Necro game so anything possible.
Cruella I'd agree with the reading that limitless means she can pick any player in event of tied lynch.
Gaston: seems straightforward.

Scar: Serial killer.

Not going to speculate on village roles, that seems only useful to the wolves.

From skimming the thread quite a bit of discussion on tallying votes and whether helpful or not. It seems a bit over the top, explaining how vote tallying works, when we've all played before. Looks like empty noise to get post count up to me.
Don't want to speculate on

[Boris the Fool]

Hi. Sorry for not posting yesterday, was a busy day.
From reading the OP and quick read of thread:
Han's peeks good. I hate this, it always makes me super paranoid.
Jafar: most powerful. The Aladdin fireball thing is interesting, is this flavour or is the fireball only useful if it hits Aladdin. Necro game so anything possible.
Cruella I'd agree with the reading that limitless means she can pick any player in event of tied lynch.
Gaston: seems straightforward.

Scar: Serial killer.

Not going to speculate on village roles, that seems only useful to the wolves.

From skimming the thread quite a bit of discussion on tallying votes and whether helpful or not. It seems a bit over the top, explaining how vote tallying works, when we've all played before. Looks like empty noise to get post count up to me.
Don't want to speculate on

The Cruella power is linked to the discussions we're having about vote tally's though

Can you name the players who are doing this to up their post counts?

We haven't all played before there are 2 new players

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Disappointed you didnt do a smart arse reply. Not liking this. You are a high volume poster but that seems somewhat reserved.

Nothing else for now. I'll be posting my Sunday thoughts this morning once ive had a full read back.

Meh, give me a chance to and I will. You had already covered it off quickly by saying it was a joke & mentioned nothing about having an issue with my reply until I brought up 'smart ass reply' right now

We had actual game discussion which I found more interesting at the time

My thoughts have changed slightly on it as i have obtained further information on it. thats the whole point of the game, gather information to form your thoughts. The game is ever evolving.

[Boris the Fool]

Meh, give me a chance to and I will. You had already covered it off quickly by saying it was a joke & mentioned nothing about having an issue with my reply until I brought up 'smart ass reply' right now

We had actual game discussion which I found more interesting at the time

My thoughts have changed slightly on it as i have obtained further information on it. thats the whole point of the game, gather information to form your thoughts. The game is ever evolving.

Your thoughts only seemed to change on me when I mentioned it though.. So I say I didn't smart ass reply you and you say 'oh I don't like that you didn't'

If you said you didn't like it before me & I had to explain it to you then I'd understand... but you waited until I said it then hopped on

[Dexter the Dragoon]

My thoughts have changed slightly on it as i have obtained further information on it. thats the whole point of the game, gather information to form your thoughts. The game is ever evolving.

Your thoughts only seemed to change on me when I mentioned it though.. So I say I didn't smart ass reply you and you say 'oh I don't like that you didn't'

If you said you didn't like it before me & I had to explain it to you then I'd understand... but you waited until I said it then hopped on

Of course my thoughts only seemed to change when you mentioned it (although not in the way you think).. you mentioning it provided me with additional information, the part that i dont like is not the exchange itself, its the post that you made saying that you were going to post a smart arse reply. it showed that you were reserved at that time and avoid confrontation. 

I'm not hopping in anything, i'm adjusting my thoughts on your whole gameplay, not my thoughts on just that exchange now and will read you in isolation later on today.

[Dexter the Dragoon]

My thoughts from Sunday

Amy - First post just before 12, thanked post by Boris just before 4, no posts since

Friar - shoot peak game.. Has been started as both wolf and village so not alignment indicative

Boris - decent volume, asking questions openly discussing points. Niggly feeling about him. heightened with reply this morning, being reserved and not TOO pushy

McDonald - mix of aggressive questioning and helpful posts. Using posts to gauge reaction..

Oprah confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

Lilly little all over the place at the mo, will see how Monday goes, I did like their breakdown straight away - also see above, not a great response to that. (edited)

Countess M - lots of oneliners, bit if shade, bit of rules lawyering

Dora - one post saying they were coming back from hols and mechanics with numbers etc

Jacob put there neck out with conversions talk, could be a distraction or just Sunday musings. Brokedown the roles nicely

Vincent and Zeena - Newbies, not really into the game yet

Gordon - Some nice posts, actively engaging, explaining (see pickle post) and not afraid to bite back

Current Post Count:


Total Posts: 149
User
# Posts
Boris the Fool
38
Dexter the Dragoon
36
Lilly the Millennial
12
McDonald the Farmer
10
Gordon the Cook
10
Countess Markievicz
9
Oprah the Gossip
8
Jacob the Tailor
5
Zeena Warrior Princess
5
Friar Tuck
4
Vincent the Artist
4
Amy the Singer
1
Dora the Explorer
1
Raymond the Shoemaker
1
Moe the Innkeeper
1


I'm on holidays (not away though boooo) this week and have loads of stuff on throughout the week with the kids starting in the afternoon today. I'll be trying to follow along and post as much as possible anyways.

[Boris the Fool]

Of course my thoughts only seemed to change when you mentioned it (although not in the way you think).. you mentioning it provided me with additional information, the part that i dont like is not the exchange itself, its the post that you made saying that you were going to post a smart arse reply. it showed that you were reserved at that time and avoid confrontation. 

I'm not hopping in anything, i'm adjusting my thoughts on your whole gameplay, not my thoughts on just that exchange now and will read you in isolation later on today.

Ok and read my post again.. I was going to smart arse reply you BUT you made a follow up post quickly after.. 0 point in doing that

And read that whole interaction from yesteday again, there was a way more important converstaion happening between us about Cruella and your 'fecked if we do and fecked if we don't' comment, which I mentioned at the time, so yeah that was my reply, rather than smart arsing you.. So I said why I think you are wrong, rather than brushing off a conversation with a silly reply... So how does that make me reserved again??

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Of course my thoughts only seemed to change when you mentioned it (although not in the way you think).. you mentioning it provided me with additional information, the part that i dont like is not the exchange itself, its the post that you made saying that you were going to post a smart arse reply. it showed that you were reserved at that time and avoid confrontation. 

I'm not hopping in anything, i'm adjusting my thoughts on your whole gameplay, not my thoughts on just that exchange now and will read you in isolation later on today.

Ok and read my post again.. I was going to smart arse reply you BUT you made a follow up post quickly after.. 0 point in doing that

And read that whole interaction from yesteday again, there was a way more important converstaion happening between us about Cruella and your 'fecked if we do and fecked if we don't' comment, which I mentioned at the time, so yeah that was my reply, rather than smart arsing you.. So I said why I think you are wrong, rather than brushing off a conversation with a silly reply... So how does that make me reserved again??

I've already said that I will be reading you in isolation so I will read that when I'm doing it.

FWIW I've liked the defending of your positioning.

[Boris the Fool]

I've already said that I will be reading you in isolation so I will read that when I'm doing it.

FWIW I've liked the defending of your positioning.

Stop trying to pocket me!... 😛

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Tra la la...and that's about as much singing as ye will have to endure from me.

Numbers look challenging especially with potential extra kills but thankfully there's an autopriest.

Agree that a tied lynch means Cruella gets to pick so avoiding that early doors will be important.

Hi Amy, I see you are online Thanking posts but not posting? Is this going to be the extent of your thoughts today 🤔

@Amy the Singer are you going to grace us with your presence today or are you going to just continue watching from afar but not engage?

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

[Boris the Fool]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

Tbf I did ask them to pretend im and eegit and explain their reasoning to me

But yeah I think they went a bit over the top in general during that whole conversation

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

TBF the poster asked for it to be explained to them as if they were an idiot..

(To quote a single post - hit reply under that post.. to multi quote, hit quote on each post and then hit new reply and they should populate in a new screen)

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

Tbf I did ask them to pretend im and eegit and explain their reasoning to me

But yeah I think they went a bit over the top in general during that whole conversation

Although I don't agree it was over the top