(17-02-2024, 12:01 PM)NNAHere Wrote: Personally, I thought 419 was more difficult than 335. In general, while I'm finding solutions to each calculation, the solutions I find tend to be relatively inefficient. You're generally more efficient!It only appears as efficiency, my way really isn't, especially given the amount of tries it takes before I finally stumble on the number. When I get stuck in a rut, I just leave it til later (or give up). You definitely have a much more efficient approach.
(18-02-2024, 10:59 PM)NNAHere Wrote: This was my solution for 466 using 3,4,5,15,18,20. However, it could be done in 4 calculations (one step of which was 18 x 27, which is unlikely to be typically spotted by a human)that was brilliant, thanks nama
20 + 5 = 25
25 × 18 = 450
15 + 4 = 19
19 − 3 = 16
16 + 450 = 466
(20-02-2024, 04:46 AM)NNAHere Wrote: That's a good sign - it means that you are working hard at the task, getting a good mental workout!It doesn't take much to challenge my mental-ness
(07-12-2023, 01:09 AM)NNAHere Wrote: Digits 12/07/23After several tries, I figured we needed another odd number, that 1 was handy to change a 4 into a 3 ....
Total: 15 ⭐s out of 15
1: 97 (97) ⭐⭐⭐ ✖️➖➖➖
2: 142 (142) ⭐⭐⭐ ✖️➗➕
3: 273 (273) ⭐⭐⭐ ✖️➕
4: 390 (390) ⭐⭐⭐ ✖️✖️➕➕
5: 419 (419) ⭐⭐⭐ ✖️✖️➕➕➕
Play today's puzzle at https://engaging-data.com/digitsgame
![[Image: NiOsTlb.png]](https://imgur.com/NiOsTlb.png)
