(13-10-2025, 04:51 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: I’d like to hear more from Betty. Their posts this morning gave the impression they’d be back as the day progressed but they’ve been silent so far.Benji your progression on Betty is piss poor tbh. You go from this post above here.
Betty then makes two posts
(13-10-2025, 05:31 PM)Betty the Beggar Wrote: My own thoughts at the moment and hopefully this won't come off as too fluffy even though it could be argued a lot of what's gone in the last few pages could serve a pillow factory but I digress.
In terms of shoot peak protect
Shoot: Wendy - just something off about their style, feel it could be argued as reaction testing but could just be a noisy wolf trying to line up convenient lynchs.
Peek: Ina - I think they're playing well enough so worth checking their alignment. Other option would be Magda, also a high poster could be worth a look.
Protect - this I can't call, I don't trust anyone quite enough for that regardless. Maybe Ben? I don't know if the heat they've received is based on little more than poking and prodding over wolf numbers. Either way feels unproductive.
I'm currently planning on voting Wendy tonight.
(13-10-2025, 05:35 PM)Betty the Beggar Wrote:(13-10-2025, 05:31 PM)Betty the Beggar Wrote: My own thoughts at the moment and hopefully this won't come off as too fluffy even though it could be argued a lot of what's gone in the last few pages could serve a pillow factory but I digress.
In terms of shoot peak protect
Shoot: Wendy - just something off about their style, feel it could be argued as reaction testing but could just be a noisy wolf trying to line up convenient lynchs.
Peek: Ina - I think they're playing well enough so worth checking their alignment. Other option would be Magda, also a high poster could be worth a look.
Protect - this I can't call, I don't trust anyone quite enough for that regardless. Maybe Ben? I don't know if the heat they've received is based on little more than poking and prodding over wolf numbers. Either way feels unproductive.
I'm currently planning on voting Wendy tonight.
That last paragraph was meant to be protect Pat, not Ben confused myself while writing 🫠 no shade at Ben just think Pat is being targeted for little else really.
And then you come back with this post here:
(13-10-2025, 06:54 PM)Benjamin the Alchemist Wrote: I just ISO’d Ina and I’m really not sure about them. Yes, they are helping with the lore stuff and they’ve plenty of game mechanic posts but everything else is very on the fence.
They say they’re robust in their posts but if we take the earlier convo about Vernon answering for Pat - it was Ina that brought attention to this and when it’s explained they go “yeah, ok” and move back to talking about lore or mechanics.
Mentions they’re voting Betty but I’m still not sure why. Is she waiting for the rest of us to jump on this slow train?
I’m thinking of voting here.
Shoot: Ina
Peek: Mick
Protect: Me
And suddenly Betty is only mentioned in the frame of me voting for them. If you didn't see my reasoning in my ISO why didn't you just ask me directly, it's a bit weird tbh to do a 180 on wanting to hear more from Betty to go after the person voting them tbh.
Make it make sense Benji