Disney Classics Werewolf

[Lilly the Millennial]

Why are you focused on Dora's possible peek and ignoring Boris's almost guaranteed peek?

Dora was killed before the lynch. My understanding is the lynch marks the change from day to night. Seers peek at night so Dora wouldn't have had the chance to peek.
Based on that I think the only possible peek would have been Boris's

For a newbie, Vincent has a good grasp on the mechanics very early into the game here. 

If we still have a gun I'd risk it and shoot Vincent.. their post progression is astounding for a newbie, so either they have picked everything up already. Or they are getting help structuring posts.

I'm going to take this as a compliment as those posts are all me.

Given that at the time of the posts the numbers were heavily in favour of the wolves, I can't imagine that a more experienced player would have encouraged me to lift my newbie head above the parapet. I'm sharing my thoughts to put them out there and hopefully help the village.

Doesn't react at all to nearly being shot. 
"I can't imagine an experienced player would have encouraged them to lift their head about the parapet."  
As an experienced player, that is exactly what I would advise a newbie to be fair. But how does a new player know that if they have never played before? 
And tbf, Vincent has never put their head above the parapet this game, so is an excellent student of Raymond and Moe! 

I was caught in work this afternoon so catching up now. Will try to address mentions or questions around me now

I had asked Vincent a question at this stage that wasn't answered, I will go and try and find that shortly. 

There's a couple of things that seem odd to me so I'll put them out there for consideration or response.

Dexter: I found it peculiar that when the game was 5 v 4 and Scar was killed that Dexter was advocating shooting me. Shooting a villager at that point would have brought the numbers to 4 v 4 which if my understanding of the win criteria is correct would have given victory immediately to the wolves.
The rationale given was post progression which seems flimsy enough to encourage that risk.

If we still have a gun I'd risk it and shoot Vincent.. their post progression is astounding for a newbie, so either they have picked everything up already. Or they are getting help structuring posts.

Jacob: Having suggested that Dora peeked Amy despite it being against usual game mechanics I'm suprised that shortly after I asked for an explanation for that thinking and Jacob then dropped considering Amy.

Alright fair it's consensus so Ill drop the Amy affront. I want Lily to pop into the thread and give us her thoughts

Countess: Now that I know more about the game, I can't figure out why there was any ambiguity over Friar Tuck's village status.

do we think friar was good? doesn't really make much difference anyway.

@Raymond the Shoemaker  - if you could expand a bit on what you mean about my not reacting I'm more than happy to try to respond

This is a very obvious wolf to wolf conversation here imo

good chance you're a wolf. you let that go way too easily

I said that I followed the logic not that I necessarily believed it. You were the first to come back of the 3 questionable things I raised it's only fair to see which thread needs more pulling before drawing a conclusion

Connie points out they let something go way too easily and they backtrack. 

What the hell is a soft role claim? Jacob has mentioned that twice now about me.

I join my fellow newbie in asking what is a soft role claim?

Again, playing up the newbie card here, but up to now seems very clued in. 
The flip flop between seeming to really understand the game, and being clueless, is stark! 

You are addressing it now but not at the time when it happened, that's what's bothering me. If you didn't see it I'd understand that as an explanation. It just seems off to me.

It was posted at 12.43 and I responded at 1.45 when I had a chance at lunch time (see below). The reason suggested for shooting me was post progression and I addressed that in my response at that time. I've now moved to questioning why anyone would have waved a gun at anyone else at that point in the game.

I'm going to take this as a compliment as those posts are all me.

Given that at the time of the posts the numbers were heavily in favour of the wolves, I can't imagine that a more experienced player would have encouraged me to lift my newbie head above the parapet. I'm sharing my thoughts to put them out there and hopefully help the village.

Again, wolf on wolf posting here. It seems rehearsed. 

@Jacob the Tailor If there's something I don't understand in the game or in individual's game play I'm asking. True I haven't thrown around names. I've not built a case solid enough to do that yet for how I'd like to play the game.

However, I do wonder when people don't respond. There's an opportunity to address my earlier point to you. The others I questioned at least came back with something. Until then my suspicion sits with you.

Jacob: Having suggested that Dora peeked Amy despite it being against usual game mechanics I'm suprised that shortly after I asked for an explanation for that thinking and Jacob then dropped considering Amy.

Has never once thrown around names that would draw suspicion. 

Numbers wise it's 5 v 2 now @Countess Markievicz

Why are you sowing confusion?

Very quick to catch Connie here on the numbers. Does a newbie NRV keep that close a watch?