(11-08-2025, 03:20 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote:(11-08-2025, 03:10 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Can you share a few of the notes from your ISO? Like you say you've ISO'd everyone & then just say Lilly & Ray are suspicious for those reasons
Give your read on me for example? Or anyone else.. I get it's D1 & all but would be interested to hear it
Am away from my computer so dont have my full notes handy but be back home in an hour and can give full details then.
My read on you was a bit spatty but not afraid to challenge and engaging with thread a lot. On Oprah I noted that I didn't really see what others were seeing in terms of sowing confusion but they were fixated on Cruella which they acknowledged themselves.
(11-08-2025, 04:02 PM)Jacob the Tailor Wrote:(11-08-2025, 10:42 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Moe has 1 post full of feck all.... read itI'm catching up today as was away yesterday. So I'm replying to posts as I come across them. Nothing but filler? - first off you contradict yourself, my opening posts were not filler, secondly, from my optics you're sowing confusion in the thread and you're not being very helpful.
Jacob. 5 posts, again, very little to go on. Discusses roles in 1 post & conversions in another. othing else really except filler
(11-08-2025, 10:46 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote:(11-08-2025, 07:43 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote: 19:40 moving my vote to amy. goes on about notes a lot, but then even with note, say jake is saying oprah is sowing confusion, when jake said amy was sowing confusion. so even her notes on sowing confusion were sowing confusion.
I made a mistake but Jacob used those exact words, just not about Oprah.
You said it first, those exact word taking about oprah and how you don't see it.
Then Jabob says you are sowing confusion.
So, why do you make a note that Jabob is saying oprah is sowing confusion?
Sure, mistake, but you used those exact words first, so i not sure what that's supposed to mean, saying jabob used those exact words.