(11-08-2025, 08:08 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote:(11-08-2025, 07:03 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Yes, as I said earlier in the day you were putting it out there that maybe we should do the on thread vote tallying to avoid a tie situation were the Cruella condition could activate. I know you were not 100% advocating it, but wondering whether worth it as a strategy. But then later you went to the idea that we all declare two possible votes and a time, which means no one has any idea whether a tie could happen or not as we have no definitive voting information.
That to me is completely contradictory because you went from wondering whether to adopt a strategy to avoid a tie situation at the possible cost of giving wolves voting info to a situation were there is no concrete voting info for anyone, hence greater chance of the Cruella condition being fulfilled.
People need to read this carefully. It's the biggest load of doublespeak I've ever read.
I never suggested full tally. I always wanted to have some buffer so wolves couldn't manipulate as easy.
People didn't like the idea of secrecy which I understood so I tried to come up with an option I thought would be a compromise of both, giving us reasonable but not perfect data while also protecting us from giving wolves too much info.
The fact people didn't think it was a good idea has no bearing on me being good or bad, moreso that I'm just not a good strategic thinker obviously.
You jumping on it with falsehoods when it's all out there clear for the reading is a major red flag.
For what it's worth I have you as village lean.
