(11-08-2025, 01:25 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote: Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.Why wouldn't we just declare who we are voting on thread? I think saying you are voting for one of two will actually lead to more confusion and be impossible to track a possibility of a tie.
Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:
1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?
2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.
A suggestion:
- Declare WHEN you voted
- List two possible players you may have voted for
This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.
Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu
3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.
Day/Night Villagers Remaining Total Players Wolves SK D1 - Flava Munch 10 15 4 1 N1 - Lynch
N1 - SK Kill8 13 4 1 D2 - Munch 7 12 4 1 N2 - Lynch
N2 - SK Kill5 9 4 1 D3 - Munch 4 8 4 1
*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)
In the event of a close wagon we can discuss it and ask an online off wagon voter to add an additional safety vote if we have for example a 4v3 situation, im not a fan of your proposal.
FFAs should be done, I agree there
