Disney Classics Werewolf

[Lilly the Millennial]

@Boris the Fool gave my take on jafar and cruella early on. Don't necessarily have any other insights on the OP as others have essentially fleshed things out. I thought it was generally straightforward tbh. It's what's not in the OP I'm weary about haha.

On the conversation around vote declaration. Fully understand the arguement about RV self pres. Which is definitely very valid. I like the idea of general ideas of where people are voting, rather than declarative votes for this specific tie problem we have. Imo, a blind tie is way less likely to happen than a declared vote tie. Groups of wolves or individuals could potentially turn a clear wagon into a 2way race for a tie.

Although now that I've written that out I'm thinking the post lynch record could potentially out them if they did something like that. So now I don't know lol

Could you explain to me how a declared vote tie is likely to happen?

I think I basically said your last line already anyway earlier. If we are declaring votes, any wolf declaring will need to vote where they say they are intending. So say wolf 1 says they will vote Boris, but ends up voting Gordon to create a tie, they look outrageously wolfy

A blind vote is just that, could go any way

Did I single out Moe? That's another thing you've gotten wrong this morning

You're arguing semantics here and you know it, just to throw a bit of shade. 👍 Have at it, at least have the decency to back up your "decisions" with actual reasonings instead of just trying to turn it into a question to someone else.. saying they have offered nothing so you should shoot them at 11am on a Monday cause they have had 1 post.. is fuckin iffy.. why not actually look into other people's posts and find some actual reasonings..

Nope, I'd shoot the low posters without giving them a chance.

@Boris the Fool a bit hypocritical here, you called me hypocritical for not giving reasons for my shoot/peek, and then drop your own picks with very weak reasons, and then done playing it when called out on it. 

You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

Nope, I don't throw shade at people for making mistakes, I was just letting you know it was Amy that posted it, I've said all I need to say so I don't see the need to continue to reply and saying the same stuff over and over

Unless it's throwing shade my way for making a mistake 😝

Morning All,
I see numbers are slightly against village initially here.
Haven't played a game on FOG before, but I see any site that doesn't jump around and isn't filled with ads as a win.
I'm not seeing anything different about the OP than what has been posted already. Let's see how it plays out.

One of the quieter Sunday threads to read compared to recent times. Little to nothing happening.

Time to get the Disney party started and in keeping with the theme, Frozen being my movie of choice.

Snowball=Shoot=Lilly
Melt=peek=Dexter

Is it to mess with your head more! Nah
Is it because Friar the Tuck doesn't like millenials? Nah
Is it because I haven't liked your posting so far? Yes

C'mon Oprah, you've got a name to live up to. Let's get to gossiping about who you'd shoot?

I'd be happy to see Oprah to disappear off to Neverneverland too

@Friar Tuck Why do you not like Oprah?

Not a huge fan of Friars posting so far, initial post very early saying there isnt much to be added to the OP discussion seems odd.

Comes back later in the evening to say the thread has been quiet, fair enough but hasnt exactly added to the thread himself with his second post when he says this. Most of sunday conversation is usually around the OP and he obviously had nothing to add.

Calls out Lily as not liking her posts without being specific.

Fires at Oprah for no specific reasoning either.

In summary, random accusations with no substance, low engagement. Wolfy behaviour IMO

I'm also not liking @Friar Tuck posting style, I know they have called me out but the reasoning just isn't there. It seems to be just "because I say so." 

Looking at Lily from the slightly chattier players

First 2 posts mentions head being wrecked by wolf peeking good & by a players name

3rd post interaacting with a newbie, fair enough

4th post, a bit more to it. Calls out McDonald in relation to a post about Jafar. Messes up the qutoes & makes a few jokey posts about that

After that theres more interaction with a newbie... then a post on who hasn't checked in

Then they ask Friar for a reason why they are shooting at them, but doesn't give a reason of their own for shooting McDonald till I ask.. Then a post saying they clarified a poisition & didn't vanish... Funnily enough haven't heard from them since!!

I went to bed, and I've been at work all morning. I'm playing catch-up on lunch right now, but once I'm back at 2pm, I'll probably be offline again until 7ish. 

But as above, you did something similar yourself today. 

You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

how did you quote just dexter, without the other quotes?

do you have to actively delete posts when replying?

This is how I messed up my quoting yesterday. I tried to delete some of the thread and deleted way too much. 

Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.

I don't know what is standard most games these days. I have played in the past, but not for a long time. 
Emphasise is a bit of a stretch too - my observation is there to call out we can't fully trust seer peeks.