(17-02-2024, 12:01 PM)NNAHere Wrote: Personally, I thought 419 was more difficult than 335. In general, while I'm finding solutions to each calculation, the solutions I find tend to be relatively inefficient. You're generally more efficient!It only appears as efficiency, my way really isn't, especially given the amount of tries it takes before I finally stumble on the number. When I get stuck in a rut, I just leave it til later (or give up). You definitely have a much more efficient approach.
I am not looking forward to 466, if it gave you a 5 number combo.