Disney Classics Werewolf

[Lilly the Millennial]

Your ISO seems to be just quoting my posts though/giving a summary. It doesn't give a reason for me to counter.
I admit they are reactionary because I am focusing on those calling me out? Am I not supposed to reply to those? Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.

Fair enough I probably should've said in that post that aside from calling out Mcdonald you haven't really offered much

Thats true that now you're having to reply to those people calling you out. So who would be your top wolf picks?

To be fair, a lot of people haven't offered much.
As I said earlier, I am at work and I will give my thoughts after 7ish today.

[Amy the Singer]

Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.

Can you share a few of the notes from your ISO? Like you say you've ISO'd everyone & then just say Lilly & Ray are suspicious for those reasons

Give your read on me for example? Or anyone else.. I get it's D1 & all but would be interested to hear it

Am away from my computer so dont have my full notes handy but be back home in an hour and can give full details then. 
My read on you was a bit spatty but not afraid to challenge and engaging with thread a lot. On Oprah I noted that I didn't really see what others were seeing in terms of sowing confusion but they were fixated on Cruella which they acknowledged themselves.

[Boris the Fool]

Can you share a few of the notes from your ISO? Like you say you've ISO'd everyone & then just say Lilly & Ray are suspicious for those reasons

Give your read on me for example? Or anyone else.. I get it's D1 & all but would be interested to hear it

Am away from my computer so dont have my full notes handy but be back home in an hour and can give full details then. 
My read on you was a bit spatty but not afraid to challenge and engaging with thread a lot. On Oprah I noted that I didn't really see what others were seeing in terms of sowing confusion but they were fixated on Cruella which they acknowledged themselves.

Ok no worries just want to hear a few cause it's easy to say you've ISO'd everyone 

I kinda had a good lean on you but reading back i'm not really sure why.. No offence! Not sure if I'd vote for you but I think I'd be more neutral than lean good

[Dexter the Dragoon]

I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

I'll be interested to see what they come back with after they iso me like they said they would!

Tbh I only have Sunday done so far, I'll post that now though as I have it on a Google doc. You have a lot of posts 😂

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Boris ISO

Sunday posts

First post, setting the marker by playing into his character

Morning folks. Hope you're not expecting too much insight from poor Boris the Fool

First thought is we don't want any tied votes until cruella is gone.

Gives a few thoughts on mechanics, numbers and thoughts on limitless then straight in to taking little shots with the “aside from being scared”

Woohoo! Hey Boris, any thoughts on the op?

Sounds like an interesting game. But one thing scares me... OP is light on details intricacies, which because it's a Necro game, makes me feel like it's going to be waaaay more complex!

Either way, excited to play and sleuth like a mofo.

I gave a few thoughts already but can give more if you'd like!

15 players isn't it? So it's 10 vs 4 vs 1 which seems tougher than usual so hopefully the more complex things help the village 😂

Any more thoughts yourself? Aside from being scared

More posts on mechanics and correcting Jacob on the meaning of limitless, filler really.

Conversions is then brought up and I agree with his posts here that conversions do not make sense.

Injects himself into discussion between myself and Mac to declare that he agrees with Mac.

I agree with old macdonal on this one, not dextors dragoon lab

Flavour be flavour but its literally a highlighted word in the OP that their choice is limitless, as an aside that they can use it as long as they are alive

We'll only know for sure if we get a tied vote but I would rather not fuck around and find out

I like the above post as it shows that he is not afraid to put his thoughts into the middle of an ongoing discussion. This continues then with a discussion between myself and Boris and the below, again putting his thoughts out which is more villagery imo

Its just my opinion anyways and would rather have my opinions on the thread where players can see them than in my head.

I do think that it's going to be a hard one to keep an eye on.. typically lists are kept and posted of declared votes*, the wolves could be watching these and push the vote to a tie and then (in the scenario that ye think) just kill off anyone at all.

* I don't agree with doing this in real time anyways as this can be beneficial to the wolves as they can make decisions based on that - if someone wants to tally the declared votes then they could do it off thread and post them after lynch to give the information. Alongside the vote results

Oh yeah I agree with that, ive a different read on it than you but I'm not saying that makes you wolfy. Its good to see who agrees with who, who doesn't etc

I also generally agree that keeping a live tally of votes on thread is more helpful to the wolves as its potentially doing their work for them. Gonna slightly contradict myself here though amd say in this game where tied votes are left to a wolf choice (whether inside or outside the tied players), i would rather there not be a tie so knowing where we stand might actually be beneficial.. happy to be told im wrong on that though cause im not sure!

This leads to the “You're wrong” post that was highlighted later by Mac.. we will get to that. Boris agrees that it was tongue in cheek.

Discussion turns to votes and another good post by Boris

Does keeping votes secret not give more chance of a tied vote?

If people are declaring votes, wolves need to vote where they say or else it will potentially look dodgy if they change an intended vote to someone else and we end up in a tie

More filler then describing how werewolf works to Newbies which isn't really alignment indicative.

Confronts lilly about being hypocritical - another good look

Why are you shooting me?!?!

Shoot = @McDonald the Farmer
Peek = @Dexter the Dragoon

Why are you shooting Mcdonald the farmer!?!?!?

Im not particularly arsed why tbh but you ask for a reason why someone would shoot you and then dont give a reason yourself for shooting someone

More declaring votes talk.

Then there is the below which gave me a niggly feeling, Boris seems like an experienced player, surely he can't believe the below, feels like agreeing for the sake of agreeing

I like this post, helpful breakdown

Could Cruella lynch two together if vote tied? Or is that too much? I'm thinking about limitless

Yay for auto priest

I hadn't thought about that but it makes sense in the use of the term 'limitless'

So a two player tie, she can kill both, 3 player tie she can kill all three?

Could be.. I still think we should be avoiding a tied vote as best we can anyway until cruella is gone

The next phase is Boris questioning the tie votes again. To Gordon this time, this leads to the whole “explain it to me like an eejit” and the pickle posts.

I think both Gordan and Boris are genuine in this exchange.

I do really like this post by him but could also see a Wolf posting it looking for Scar in the midst of the discussion about tie votes

Worse still, Scar, the treacherous lion who betrayed his own family, now hunts alone. He has no allegiance—only hunger. He kills in secret at each lynch.. He plays both sides. He wants to be the last one standing. He wants Simba dead at all costs. No bodyguard or protection can prevent Scar’s claws from finding their target.

- missed this, obviously keep an eye out for playing both sides and generally agreeable. Someone who doesn't want to pick sides

Just wondering, how did you read all the wolf roles and good roles from the OP and miss scar?

Personally think he should have followed up on this a bit more, I don't think Jacob replied.

Filler gif and then posts the below

Eh, you find it odd that i can't see the future, and react to things that have not happened yet?
You must be a precog.

Normally, i read, react, and then when a future post gets posted, i'll read that.

You get suspicious because somebody did not read something they have not read yet? 🤷‍♂️

Did your read of the post change after Dexters follow up?

This was already discussed so I don't understand why he was being it up again. Just posting it for the sake of posting..

Sunday posts, majority of posts are good with village leanings not pushing too much but there are one or two that stick out and lead me to have niggly feeling there.

[Boris the Fool]

I won't argue ive a lot of posts!

Only things i think need a reply is that yeah if agree looking back it probably wouldn't make sense cruella could kill 2 or 3 people in one go.. it does fit the term limitless though and doesn't change my position on the overarching point that we should be avoiding ties

And yes Jacob has not replied to me, don't think they have posted today at all so can't push them

[Jacob the Tailor]

Does keeping votes secret not give more chance of a tied vote?

If people are declaring votes, wolves need to vote where they say or else it will potentially look dodgy if they change an intended vote to someone else and we end up in a tie

I'm catching up page by page. Transparency is key, especially if there is a someone who can manipulate votes . I don't see the benefit in hiding who we vote for

[Jacob the Tailor]

Worse still, Scar, the treacherous lion who betrayed his own family, now hunts alone. He has no allegiance—only hunger. He kills in secret at each lynch.. He plays both sides. He wants to be the last one standing. He wants Simba dead at all costs. No bodyguard or protection can prevent Scar’s claws from finding their target.

- missed this, obviously keep an eye out for playing both sides and generally agreeable. Someone who doesn't want to pick sides

Just wondering, how did you read all the wolf roles and good roles from the OP and miss scar?

 
Didnt pay enough attention so went back after reading properly

[Boris the Fool]

Does keeping votes secret not give more chance of a tied vote?

If people are declaring votes, wolves need to vote where they say or else it will potentially look dodgy if they change an intended vote to someone else and we end up in a tie

I'm catching up page by page. Transparency is key, especially if there is a someone who can manipulate votes . I don't see the benefit in hiding who we vote for

From the OP the only wolf I'd say who could possibly manipulate votes is Jafar.. Do we think it is possible?

[Boris the Fool]

Just wondering, how did you read all the wolf roles and good roles from the OP and miss scar?

 
Didnt pay enough attention so went back after reading properly

But Scar is right slap bang in between the bad & good roles & is highlighted. I dunno how you could miss it in the OP if you've read the goodies & baddies

[Dexter the Dragoon]

My thoughts from Sunday

Amy - First post just before 12, thanked post by Boris just before 4, no posts since

Friar - shoot peak game.. Has been started as both wolf and village so not alignment indicative

Boris - decent volume, asking questions openly discussing points. Niggly feeling about him. heightened with reply this morning, being reserved and not TOO pushy

McDonald - mix of aggressive questioning and helpful posts. Using posts to gauge reaction..

Oprah confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

Lilly little all over the place at the mo, will see how Monday goes, I did like their breakdown straight away - also see above, not a great response to that. (edited)

Countess M - lots of oneliners, bit if shade, bit of rules lawyering

Dora - one post saying they were coming back from hols and mechanics with numbers etc

Jacob put there neck out with conversions talk, could be a distraction or just Sunday musings. Brokedown the roles nicely

Vincent and Zeena - Newbies, not really  into the game yet

Gordon - Some nice posts, actively engaging, explaining (see pickle post) and not afraid to bite back

Current Post Count:


Total Posts: 149
User
# Posts
Boris the Fool
38
Dexter the Dragoon
36
Lilly the Millennial
12
McDonald the Farmer
10
Gordon the Cook
10
Countess Markievicz
9
Oprah the Gossip
8
Jacob the Tailor
5
Zeena Warrior Princess
5
Friar Tuck
4
Vincent the Artist
4
Amy the Singer
1
Dora the Explorer
1
Raymond the Shoemaker
1
Moe the Innkeeper
1


I'm on holidays (not away though boooo) this week and have loads of stuff on throughout the week with the kids starting in the afternoon today. I'll be trying to follow along and post as much as possible anyways.

I've already said that I will be reading you in isolation so I will read that when I'm doing it.

FWIW I've liked the defending of your positioning.

I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

I have absolutely no problem with confrontation, did you read the thread in full? If you did there are numerous confrontations with me in them.

As for the list, it was my notes from Sunday. Do you have a fully extensive read list from a Sunday where there is not much happening? Your post is hogwash..

[Jacob the Tailor]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

Ok so suggest something that might work

[Jacob the Tailor]

That's a decent observation there, could be one of the Secret roles gaining their powers from today onwards.

Hopefully they have a gun and they can shoot @Oprah the Gossip

I'd take a punt at @Jacob the Tailor at the moment.. Open to change though obviously as it's early!

Or @Moe the Innkeeper actually, maybe between those 2

 Why me? You're swinging around the thread like a bull in a china shop at the moment, take a breath will you

[Jacob the Tailor]

Why those two? 

@Dexter the Dragoon why @Oprah the Gossip ?

Moe has 1 post full of feck all.... read it

Jacob. 5 posts, again, very little to go on. Discusses roles in 1 post & conversions in another. othing else really except filler

I'm catching up today as was away yesterday. So I'm replying to posts as I come across them. Nothing but filler? - first off you contradict yourself, my opening posts were not filler, secondly, from my optics you're sowing confusion in the thread and you're not being very helpful.

[Raymond the Shoemaker]

Not sure if I'm quoting correctly but regarding the vote tallying discussion I think it's valid to discuss whether vote tallying is useful on thread given the tie dynamic in play, but it was the manner in which it was explained which I didn't like. The whole pickle analogy just seemed a bit like explaining things to a toddler and wasn't necessary in my view.

Ok so suggest something that might work

I've already said I think people should vote declare on thread. I'm not certain whether someone should do a running tally on thread to avoid a tie, perhaps if it looks like a two or three way wagon we should do it but otherwise not.

I definitely don't think we should be declaring two possible votes or hiding votes as I don't want rolled village lynched because they didn't know they were in danger, I don't want inadvertently ties and I don't want to hive the wolves a chance to manipulate close wagons with the cover of two possible votes. And I am definitely suspicious of anyone who advocates or supports this strategy. It's lose lose for the village as far as I can tell.

[Oprah the Gossip]

Yes interact with everyone and that can include asking anyone are they a wolf , you'd never know a wolf might slip up , I wasn't picking on you as a newbie sorry if you felt that way

Have you ever asked anyone 'are you a wolf' before and they have slipped up and said 'yes Oprah, im a big bad wolf... oops'

If anything along those lines has happened before id love to read it!

Of course no one will reveal that but they may reveal something useful for later on the in game in a slip up, you would never know, any angry frustrated stressed wolf player might slip up

[Boris the Fool]

Moe has 1 post full of feck all.... read it

Jacob. 5 posts, again, very little to go on. Discusses roles in 1 post & conversions in another. othing else really except filler

I'm catching up today as was away yesterday. So I'm replying to posts as I come across them. Nothing but filler? - first off you contradict yourself, my opening posts were not filler, secondly, from my optics you're sowing confusion in the thread and you're not being very helpful.

Of your 5 posts at the time,  I think my summary was fairly well reasoned.. you went through the roles of the game,  and you discussed conversions. 

I didn't see much questioning of others or thread engagement 

I try to get people talking,  im interacting and questioning as much as i can.  If that's a bull in a China shop or sowing confusion in your perspective i think you're being a bit disingenuous, but so be it

[Oprah the Gossip]

That's a decent observation there, could be one of the Secret roles gaining their powers from today onwards.

Hopefully they have a gun and they can shoot @Oprah the Gossip

Why me?

[Boris the Fool]

Have you ever asked anyone 'are you a wolf' before and they have slipped up and said 'yes Oprah, im a big bad wolf... oops'

If anything along those lines has happened before id love to read it!

Of course no one will reveal that but they may reveal something useful for later on the in game in a slip up, you would never know, any angry frustrated stressed wolf player might slip up

I really don't think there's much point to asking 'are you a wolf' to someone.

On that,  who do you think is a wolf?

[Dexter the Dragoon]

That's a decent observation there, could be one of the Secret roles gaining their powers from today onwards.

Hopefully they have a gun and they can shoot @Oprah the Gossip

Why me?

Why not you? What are you planning on bringing to the tabl?, why are you parroting other players posts? I presume you have read the thread? Who is on your FFA?

[Oprah the Gossip]

I won't argue ive a lot of posts!

Only things i think need a reply is that yeah if agree looking back it probably wouldn't make sense cruella could kill 2 or 3 people in one go.. it does fit the term limitless though and doesn't change my position on the overarching point that we should be avoiding ties

And yes Jacob has not replied to me, don't think they have posted today at all so can't push them

Cruella having that much kills in one go would be a huge advantage to the wolves and with the whole player numbers I doubt it 

I am thinking she can decide the tie and maybe change the target, so if the lynch tie is A and B, they could make it C, gave their name to Necro before lynch incase of a tie and they are away, offline

[Jacob the Tailor]

I'm catching up page by page. Transparency is key, especially if there is a someone who can manipulate votes . I don't see the benefit in hiding who we vote for

From the OP the only wolf I'd say who could possibly manipulate votes is Jafar.. Do we think it is possible?

If he's a JOAT them maybe, but thinking on it it would be massively OP if they could manipulate votes and trigger Cruellas power so maybe not. Irrespective, the more data we have on who voted for who on thread the better, we have optics on a possible tie beforehand so we dot. Trigger Cruella also

[Dora the Explorer]

I'm catching up page by page. Transparency is key, especially if there is a someone who can manipulate votes . I don't see the benefit in hiding who we vote for

From the OP the only wolf I'd say who could possibly manipulate votes is Jafar.. Do we think it is possible?

I am saying no to this, simply because it is too unbalanced tbh.

[Oprah the Gossip]

I'd be happy to see Oprah to disappear off to Neverneverland too

Why just jumping on the Dexter bandwagon on me, very wolfy just to jump in on someone with no reasoning, I know it is day 1 but try to think for yourself

[Dora the Explorer]

I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

I have absolutely no problem with confrontation, did you read the thread in full? If you did there are numerous confrontations with me in them.

As for the list, it was my notes from Sunday. Do you have a fully extensive read list from a Sunday where there is not much happening? Your post is hogwash..

No because there isnt much rational reason to do a reads list from D0 when by your own admission there is not much happening. I play the game differently to you, I go read a players posts and interactions, as I said, I like your postings on first reasoning and went back to do my second reading. I didnt like your reads list/thoughts post, I didnt like a couple of posts later you being challenged and rolling back. Nice use of the word Hogwash though, someone from the middle ages is nodding approvement from above.

[Gordon the Cook]

General vibe I'm getting is that people want to stick to the usual gameplan - do FFAs and full Vote Declaration?

If anyone majorly disagrees with this, please shout.

I'll try to tally a consensus and post when I can, or if anyone else has some time, please feel free.

[Jacob the Tailor]

Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

Ok, tell me who you shoot, peek and protect?

[Jacob the Tailor]

I'd be happy to see Oprah to disappear off to Neverneverland too

Why just jumping on the Dexter bandwagon on me, very wolfy just to jump in on someone with no reasoning, I know it is day 1 but try to think for yourself

Who would you protect?

[Dexter the Dragoon]

I have absolutely no problem with confrontation, did you read the thread in full? If you did there are numerous confrontations with me in them.

As for the list, it was my notes from Sunday. Do you have a fully extensive read list from a Sunday where there is not much happening? Your post is hogwash..

No because there isnt much rational reason to do a reads list from D0 when by your own admission there is not much happening. I play the game differently to you, I go read a players posts and interactions, as I said, I like your postings on first reasoning and went back to do my second reading. I didnt like your reads list/thoughts post, I didnt like a couple of posts later you being challenged and rolling back. Nice use of the word Hogwash though, someone from the middle ages is nodding approvement from above.

You are the one titling that a reads list, I never said it was a reads list, I labeled it thoughts for a reason. So you have done 2 read backs, what are your "thoughts" on posters as of now..

[Dexter the Dragoon]

Cruella having that much kills in one go would be a huge advantage to the wolves and with the whole player numbers I doubt it 

You were the one who brought that up first 🤷‍♂️

I like this post, helpful breakdown 

Could Cruella lynch two together if vote tied? Or is that too much? I'm thinking about limitless 

Yay for auto priest

I am thinking she can decide the tie and maybe change the target, so if the lynch tie is A and B, they could make it C, gave their name to Necro before lynch incase of a tie and they are away, offline

Parroting other people's posts again, do you do tricks? Or even have any thoughts for yourself.

[Oprah the Gossip]

Why those two? 

@Dexter the Dragoon why @Oprah the Gossip ?

From my notes - 

Sunday - Oprah, confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

There are numerous posts of hers that are just saying the exact same thing that posters have said prior to this. She doesn't seem to have her own thoughts.

When reading back, near every time I read one of her posts, I thought to myself that I had read that before from someone else.

She is parroting and I think she is a wolf

You really think a wolf repeats and asks wolf ? to start with in the game

[Dexter the Dragoon]

From my notes - 

Sunday - Oprah, confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

There are numerous posts of hers that are just saying the exact same thing that posters have said prior to this. She doesn't seem to have her own thoughts.

When reading back, near every time I read one of her posts, I thought to myself that I had read that before from someone else.

She is parroting and I think she is a wolf

You really think a wolf repeats and asks wolf ? to start with in the game

It has been done numerous times before yes..

[Oprah the Gossip]

Cruella having that much kills in one go would be a huge advantage to the wolves and with the whole player numbers I doubt it 

You were the one who brought that up first 🤷‍♂️

I like this post, helpful breakdown 

Could Cruella lynch two together if vote tied? Or is that too much? I'm thinking about limitless 

Yay for auto priest

I am thinking she can decide the tie and maybe change the target, so if the lynch tie is A and B, they could make it C, gave their name to Necro before lynch incase of a tie and they are away, offline

Parroting other people's posts again, do you do tricks? Or even have any thoughts for yourself.

Others could be parrotting me , I am tunnelling on limitless Cruella just let me dig away

[Jacob the Tailor]

From my notes - 

Sunday - Oprah, confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

There are numerous posts of hers that are just saying the exact same thing that posters have said prior to this. She doesn't seem to have her own thoughts.

When reading back, near every time I read one of her posts, I thought to myself that I had read that before from someone else.

She is parroting and I think she is a wolf

You really think a wolf repeats and asks wolf ? to start with in the game

 It's not looking good oprah, reading your post you don't offer much and it really does look like filler to me. You also mention wolf or wolves in most posts, it's as if you're projecting all the time.

[Oprah the Gossip]

Why just jumping on the Dexter bandwagon on me, very wolfy just to jump in on someone with no reasoning, I know it is day 1 but try to think for yourself

Who would you protect?

I would protect Lily

[Dexter the Dragoon]

You were the one who brought that up first 🤷‍♂️


Parroting other people's posts again, do you do tricks? Or even have any thoughts for yourself.

Others could be parrotting me , I am tunnelling on limitless Cruella just let me dig away

How could others be parroting you if you are posting after them?

[Boris the Fool]

Yeah I could definitely vote Oprah here, not a fan of the responses

Think if I was to ffa it would be
Oprah
Lilly

Not comfortable voting Jacob or Gordon at the moment

Could do with hearing more from moe (points for the read list earlier) and Amy but that's more for tomorrow i think. Not too sure on Raymond either

[Oprah the Gossip]

General vibe I'm getting is that people want to stick to the usual gameplan - do FFAs and full Vote Declaration?

If anyone majorly disagrees with this, please shout.

I'll try to tally a consensus and post when I can, or if anyone else has some time, please feel free.

I am happy with FFA and vote declaration

[Oprah the Gossip]

You really think a wolf repeats and asks wolf ? to start with in the game

 It's not looking good oprah, reading your post you don't offer much and it really does look like filler to me. You also mention wolf or wolves in most posts, it's as if you're projecting all the time.

It is a waste voting me as it reduces the village numbers which are needed 

I am finding the jump on me very sussy with no real valid reason 

I am not the only one concentrating on limitless Cruella

[Boris the Fool]

Countess is kinda skating by a little too i think

Haven't looked back at all their posts but a few today on quoting posts and talking about the flavour munch... anything else?