(11-08-2025, 12:24 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 12:17 PM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote: Can you expand on this, I don't understand what you mean here, it might just be me but it's confusing me what you are trying to say

with no flavour munch today, we would lynch someone tonight for no reason. 
that makes the village the bad guys.

now, with the flavour munch, we have a reason to lynch someone

(11-08-2025, 01:16 PM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:08 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.

Amy didn't post the ISO's

(11-08-2025, 01:08 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Can you expand on this part please, what else did you notice

(10-08-2025, 10:20 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote:

(10-08-2025, 10:12 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote: @Boris the Fool gave my take on jafar and cruella early on. Don't necessarily have any other insights on the OP as others have essentially fleshed things out. I thought it was generally straightforward tbh. It's what's not in the OP I'm weary about haha.

On the conversation around vote declaration. Fully understand the arguement about RV self pres. Which is definitely very valid. I like the idea of general ideas of where people are voting, rather than declarative votes for this specific tie problem we have. Imo, a blind tie is way less likely to happen than a declared vote tie. Groups of wolves or individuals could potentially turn a clear wagon into a 2way race for a tie.

Although now that I've written that out I'm thinking the post lynch record could potentially out them if they did something like that. So now I don't know lol

Could you explain to me how a declared vote tie is likely to happen?

I think I basically said your last line already anyway earlier. If we are declaring votes, any wolf declaring will need to vote where they say they are intending. So say wolf 1 says they will vote Boris, but ends up voting Gordon to create a tie, they look outrageously wolfy

A blind vote is just that, could go any way

(11-08-2025, 10:56 AM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 10:49 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Did I single out Moe? That's another thing you've gotten wrong this morning

You're arguing semantics here and you know it, just to throw a bit of shade. 👍 Have at it, at least have the decency to back up your "decisions" with actual reasonings instead of just trying to turn it into a question to someone else.. saying they have offered nothing so you should shoot them at 11am on a Monday cause they have had 1 post.. is fuckin iffy.. why not actually look into other people's posts and find some actual reasonings..

Nope, I'd shoot the low posters without giving them a chance.

(11-08-2025, 11:21 AM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 11:18 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

Nope, I don't throw shade at people for making mistakes, I was just letting you know it was Amy that posted it, I've said all I need to say so I don't see the need to continue to reply and saying the same stuff over and over

(11-08-2025, 11:36 AM)Dora the Explorer Wrote:

(10-08-2025, 11:48 AM)Friar Tuck Wrote: Morning All,
I see numbers are slightly against village initially here.
Haven't played a game on FOG before, but I see any site that doesn't jump around and isn't filled with ads as a win.
I'm not seeing anything different about the OP than what has been posted already. Let's see how it plays out.

(10-08-2025, 07:56 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote: One of the quieter Sunday threads to read compared to recent times. Little to nothing happening.

Time to get the Disney party started and in keeping with the theme, Frozen being my movie of choice.

Snowball=Shoot=Lilly
Melt=peek=Dexter

(10-08-2025, 10:37 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote: Is it to mess with your head more! Nah
Is it because Friar the Tuck doesn't like millenials? Nah
Is it because I haven't liked your posting so far? Yes

(10-08-2025, 10:39 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote: C'mon Oprah, you've got a name to live up to. Let's get to gossiping about who you'd shoot?

(11-08-2025, 11:07 AM)Friar Tuck Wrote: I'd be happy to see Oprah to disappear off to Neverneverland too

@Friar Tuck Why do you not like Oprah?

Not a huge fan of Friars posting so far, initial post very early saying there isnt much to be added to the OP discussion seems odd.

Comes back later in the evening to say the thread has been quiet, fair enough but hasnt exactly added to the thread himself with his second post when he says this. Most of sunday conversation is usually around the OP and he obviously had nothing to add.

Calls out Lily as not liking her posts without being specific.

Fires at Oprah for no specific reasoning either.

In summary, random accusations with no substance, low engagement. Wolfy behaviour IMO

(11-08-2025, 11:53 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Looking at Lily from the slightly chattier players

First 2 posts mentions head being wrecked by wolf peeking good & by a players name

3rd post interaacting with a newbie, fair enough

4th post, a bit more to it. Calls out McDonald in relation to a post about Jafar. Messes up the qutoes & makes a few jokey posts about that

After that theres more interaction with a newbie... then a post on who hasn't checked in

Then they ask Friar for a reason why they are shooting at them, but doesn't give a reason of their own for shooting McDonald till I ask.. Then a post saying they clarified a poisition & didn't vanish... Funnily enough haven't heard from them since!!

(11-08-2025, 12:11 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 11:18 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: You'll have to string me up for that mistake so

Presume that means you've nothing else from my reply?

how did you quote just dexter, without the other quotes?

do you have to actively delete posts when replying?

(11-08-2025, 12:24 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.

(11-08-2025, 01:28 PM)Moe the Innkeeper Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 12:24 PM)Countess Markievicz Wrote: with no flavour munch today, we would lynch someone tonight for no reason. 
that makes the village the bad guys.

now, with the flavour munch, we have a reason to lynch someone

Can you explain this? A flavour munch is a standard mechanic used to allow all players have some game time.

@Gordon the Cook, why did you ask what a flavour munch is? Have you not played a Boards game before?

(11-08-2025, 01:08 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Reading back over thread.

Thoughts so far. Most likely village, Dexter, Mc, Boris and Jacob.
Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.
Vincent and Zeena newbies so not in consideration for tonight but I don't think would be anyway.

Neutral on Friar and Dora.

Didn't like Oprah harassing a newbie, it's not fair to someone finding their feet. Not sure it's enough for me to vote there.

Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Gordon don't like. Seems overdramatic and a lot of hot air. I don't understand an experienced player talking about not declaring votes, this always helps with wagonomics, if declared votes don't match actual votes post lynch. I also thought they spent too long on this topic, just seemed like posting for no real benefit. Also the anti Boris tone seemed a bit strong on day one with nothing to go on.

(11-08-2025, 01:31 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 11:21 AM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote: Nope, I don't throw shade at people for making mistakes, I was just letting you know it was Amy that posted it, I've said all I need to say so I don't see the need to continue to reply and saying the same stuff over and over

Unless it's throwing shade my way for making a mistake 😝

(11-08-2025, 01:37 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: @Lilly the Millennial

It pinged at the time to me cause you asked someone why shoot you but didn't give reasons of your own.. that is a fact... call my reasonings weak or whatever but if you ask someone for a reason why they would shoot you, then proceed in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd

Looks like you're just calling out players who call you out, like me and friar tuck

(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: @Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

(11-08-2025, 01:42 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Where i am atm:

Id remove Moe from my choices this morning and add lilly

Then yeah id wanna hear more from Oprah this afternoon as I get why theres suspicion there from what a few others have said

Gordon is down my suspicions list at the moment,  definitely not sure here but they seem more flustered which comes across as genuine. Still on my radar though

Would still like to hear more from jacob

(11-08-2025, 01:40 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:37 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: @Lilly the Millennial

It pinged at the time to me cause you asked someone why shoot you but didn't give reasons of your own.. that is a fact... call my reasonings weak or whatever but if you ask someone for a reason why they would shoot you, then proceed in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd

Looks like you're just calling out players who call you out, like me and friar tuck

No I was just responding to posts that specifically mentioned me in my catch up, or I felt needed a reply. I haven't done my FFA yet, I'm still thinking about it.

Also I don't find it odd, I replied like with like, looking for a bit of a reaction. It's odd it came from you though.

(11-08-2025, 01:44 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: @Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

(11-08-2025, 01:44 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: @Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

(11-08-2025, 01:46 PM)Friar Tuck Wrote: I don’t dislike Oprah for the record. She posted who she would peek but didn't for shoot. I don't like that. There's no discussion created. So I asked her directly and she has yet to respond.

Re. Lilly. Didn't like the initial posts and don't like the defensive posts afterwards either.

As of now my vote will go somewhere here.

If i see something I dont like I'll question it. Of you want to know something Lilly, ask away and I'll answer

(11-08-2025, 01:48 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:40 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote: No I was just responding to posts that specifically mentioned me in my catch up, or I felt needed a reply. I haven't done my FFA yet, I'm still thinking about it.

Also I don't find it odd, I replied like with like, looking for a bit of a reaction. It's odd it came from you though.

Its odd that you mentioned me in your post and I replied? Is that what the last paragraph means?

(11-08-2025, 01:47 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:42 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Where i am atm:

Id remove Moe from my choices this morning and add lilly

Then yeah id wanna hear more from Oprah this afternoon as I get why theres suspicion there from what a few others have said

Gordon is down my suspicions list at the moment,  definitely not sure here but they seem more flustered which comes across as genuine. Still on my radar though

Would still like to hear more from jacob

And your reasoning for me? Is it just because I called you out?

(11-08-2025, 01:55 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:48 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Its odd that you mentioned me in your post and I replied? Is that what the last paragraph means?

No. You said

Quote:in the same post to not give any reasons for your own choice, its odd
[\quote]
I said it's odd the answer came from you and not Tuck. It was like you were coming in to his defense.

(11-08-2025, 01:57 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:47 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote: And your reasoning for me? Is it just because I called you out?

No i did a little iso on you earlier and didn't really like what was there

Aside from calling out Mcdonald most of your posts now are reactionary. At least your on fighting though so I'll give you some points for that

(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: @Gordon the Cook

I agree with you on FFAs and vote declarations. Time and 2 names should cover it.
FFAs should come with reasons and not just names too.

(11-08-2025, 01:49 PM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:44 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Explain this. Why give a time and two names? If someone is declaring a vote then they should be honest and not obfuscate. Two votes to me is just giving cover to wolves to change their vote. Or do you mean only two names in a FFA, and if so, why only two? 
I'm genuinely mot understanding the reasoning behind this post.

If you don't understand why the time then you haven't read the OP fully. Start there and you will understand

(11-08-2025, 02:04 PM)Lilly the Millennial Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:57 PM)Boris the Fool Wrote: No i did a little iso on you earlier and didn't really like what was there

Aside from calling out Mcdonald most of your posts now are reactionary. At least your on fighting though so I'll give you some points for that

Your ISO seems to be just quoting my posts though/giving a summary. It doesn't give a reason for me to counter.
I admit they are reactionary because I am focusing on those calling me out? Am I not supposed to reply to those? Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.

(11-08-2025, 01:25 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote: Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

(11-08-2025, 02:15 PM)McDonald the Farmer Wrote: 2. This is like a mine ffa, maybe we should downsize the ffa to 2 players.
that combines 1 & 2
ffa was originally designed to do what your 2 is attempting.
so maybe just 2 with reasoning, instead of 1 & 2.

(11-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 01:08 PM)Raymond the Shoemaker Wrote: Reading back over thread.

Thoughts so far. Most likely village, Dexter, Mc, Boris and Jacob.
Amy likely good now. Was forgettable to me, but her ISOs redeemed her in my eyes even if she doesn't like me. Seems to be genuinely wolf hunting.
Vincent and Zeena newbies so not in consideration for tonight but I don't think would be anyway.

Neutral on Friar and Dora.

Didn't like Oprah harassing a newbie, it's not fair to someone finding their feet. Not sure it's enough for me to vote there.

Lilly the whole chaos thing seemed a bit overblown. There was something else I noticed on read back I didn't like.

Gordon don't like. Seems overdramatic and a lot of hot air. I don't understand an experienced player talking about not declaring votes, this always helps with wagonomics, if declared votes don't match actual votes post lynch. I also thought they spent too long on this topic, just seemed like posting for no real benefit. Also the anti Boris tone seemed a bit strong on day one with nothing to go on.

Don't know why you wouldn't understand it, I've laid my thoughts out clearly the whole time. I'm worried the wolves will be able to manipulate us too easily with and use Cruella's power to do heavy damage. 

Admittedly, I'm not the best player, or the wisest. Which is why I share my thoughts on thread so that people can discuss and explain why or why not...

I'm still of the mind that an all out declaration may be more of a benefit to the wolves than the village, but I'm happy to go with consensus regardless.

(11-08-2025, 01:25 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote: Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

(11-08-2025, 01:25 PM)Gordon the Cook Wrote: Ok, thanks for the intervention there. I can tend to find things to hyperanalyse or obsess over, so being able to share my thoughts and get a good village consensus on them is the best way for me to not go off the deep end and waste my energy.

Taking a step back from my admittedly fiery (but only in the spirit of helping) start, a few things I think we should legitimately and calmly discuss/agree on before it gets too close to lynch time and things get a bit bonkers:

1. FFAs — can we agree to either all post or not?
I think we should, as it’s more info for us to go on, but may not necessarily give wolves too much.
If we agree, we should try to get them in at least an hour before votes so there’s time to discuss.
If you disagree, what’s your alternative?

2. Vote declaration — powerful village tool, but… Cruella
Vote declaration - Lynch result versus declared votes is a powerful village tool, BUT Cruella
I want us to have some way of ensuring that when we have the results, we can use the information to our advantage, but I don't want to spoon feed a targeted kill to cruella.

A suggestion:

• Declare WHEN you voted
  
• List two possible players you may have voted for
  

This gives us clear info on whether people stayed on their wagons and within their declarations, but doesn’t openly specify enough for wolves to fully manipulate.

Thoughts? Any better ideas? I'm fu

3. Worst-case scenario table
Based on what we know for sure about the number of kills so far. I expect there may be some unexpected ones in here, and I haven’t included Jafar’s Fireball as its mechanic is unclear.

Day/Night	Villagers Remaining	Total Players	Wolves	SK
D1 - Flava Munch	10	15	4	1
N1 - Lynch N1 - SK Kill	8	13	4	1
D2 - Munch	7	12	4	1
N2 - Lynch N2 - SK Kill	5	9	4	1
D3 - Munch	4	8	4	1

*sorry, I started this after everyone replied to my flava post, but had a meeting so just getting to post now (after not catching up on thread)

(11-08-2025, 08:46 AM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote: My thoughts from Sunday

Amy - First post just before 12, thanked post by Boris just before 4, no posts since

Friar - shoot peak game.. Has been started as both wolf and village so not alignment indicative

Boris - decent volume, asking questions openly discussing points. Niggly feeling about him. heightened with reply this morning, being reserved and not TOO pushy

McDonald - mix of aggressive questioning and helpful posts. Using posts to gauge reaction..

Oprah confusion/chaos central, 100% parroting others - will probably be voting here unless they actually start to wolf hunt properly (not saying "Are you a wolf" constantly)

Lilly little all over the place at the mo, will see how Monday goes, I did like their breakdown straight away - also see above, not a great response to that. (edited)

Countess M - lots of oneliners, bit if shade, bit of rules lawyering

Dora - one post saying they were coming back from hols and mechanics with numbers etc

Jacob put there neck out with conversions talk, could be a distraction or just Sunday musings. Brokedown the roles nicely

Vincent and Zeena - Newbies, not really  into the game yet

Gordon - Some nice posts, actively engaging, explaining (see pickle post) and not afraid to bite back

Current Post Count:


Total Posts: 149
User
# Posts
Boris the Fool
38
Dexter the Dragoon
36
Lilly the Millennial
12
McDonald the Farmer
10
Gordon the Cook
10
Countess Markievicz
9
Oprah the Gossip
8
Jacob the Tailor
5
Zeena Warrior Princess
5
Friar Tuck
4
Vincent the Artist
4
Amy the Singer
1
Dora the Explorer
1
Raymond the Shoemaker
1
Moe the Innkeeper
1


I'm on holidays (not away though boooo) this week and have loads of stuff on throughout the week with the kids starting in the afternoon today. I'll be trying to follow along and post as much as possible anyways.

(11-08-2025, 08:58 AM)Dexter the Dragoon Wrote:

(11-08-2025, 08:48 AM)Boris the Fool Wrote: Ok and read my post again.. I was going to smart arse reply you BUT you made a follow up post quickly after.. 0 point in doing that

And read that whole interaction from yesteday again, there was a way more important converstaion happening between us about Cruella and your 'fecked if we do and fecked if we don't' comment, which I mentioned at the time, so yeah that was my reply, rather than smart arsing you.. So I said why I think you are wrong, rather than brushing off a conversation with a silly reply... So how does that make me reserved again??

I've already said that I will be reading you in isolation so I will read that when I'm doing it.

FWIW I've liked the defending of your positioning.

(11-08-2025, 02:37 PM)Dora the Explorer Wrote: I like most of Dexters postings on a first read through, second time round though the reads list seems a little off to me. It is a big list but not actually saying a lot. More of a summary of what he has seen as opposed to his thoughts. Most places where he has a negative towards someone, it is generally followed by a positive. Then when challenged there is a bit of a role back and "I actually like you" type of reply. Feels like Dexter is a little bit keen to avoid confrontation

(11-08-2025, 01:47 PM)Zeena Warrior Princess Wrote: Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

(11-08-2025, 02:35 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: I'm out tonight at the theatre (because Im fancy like that) and won't get a chance to switch my vote last minute. Giving a heads up early just in case.

(11-08-2025, 02:35 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: I'm out tonight at the theatre (because Im fancy like that) and won't get a chance to switch my vote last minute. Giving a heads up early just in case.

(11-08-2025, 01:47 PM)Zeena Warrior Princess Wrote: Just catching up on my lunchbreak and to be honest Im finding it hard to follow with all the multiple quotes per post.

I really have no idea how Im supposed to figure out who is bad and who is good but I'll try read through all the posts after work to get a better handle on it.

(11-08-2025, 12:24 PM)Amy the Singer Wrote: Have read back and ISOd everyone. From my notes, Lily and Ray are suspicious. Both of them emphasise the peeking good wolf, which tbh is almost standard in most games these days so not really worth noting. It's mostly tone reading for me - neither come across as sincere, it feels forced.

That said, my notes on others are largely 'unsure' because it's D1 and there's the usual amount of nothing to go on.