(05-10-2021, 07:31 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:10 PM)nothing Wrote: Does anyone else feel like Duff, LadyS and Barney are scrambling to point fingers at everyone else?

I like that trio. I like you for seeing that trio.

(05-10-2021, 07:12 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 06:40 PM)guirienespana Wrote: We have a vig. Did they hold fire, was their target protected, or bulletproof, or did they kill CEE Jay? 
I was the only one who had Cee Jay on my FFA, so he was not generally suspected, but did anyone express a village lean on him (or her)?

If there’s one of more wolf on Baggly I think it’s Duffman.

Has anyone ever played an evening game before? Do wolves submit their target before 5pm or 6pm?

I've assumed they have up until 5:59:59pm to vote.

(05-10-2021, 07:16 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: At the moment everyone is flinging shit and hoping some sticks somewhere, it's the perfect place for the wolves to hide.

Most agree there's at least one wolf in the Baggly voters so start looking at those of us who voted for him.

(05-10-2021, 07:35 PM)Duffman13 Wrote: Nothing out of the baggly voters

Guirienespana out of the non baggly voters

Two biggest wolf leans at the moment

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Necro Wrote: Lynch at 9pm

Lynch Form Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdecVtww714ZBlvLqHPE8sNTBsVhkOlDthqn9Xy056lUXqr8A/viewform

Trigger is running it solo tonight as I'm at panto practice so be nice to him folks

(05-10-2021, 07:33 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:28 PM)Barney92 Wrote: I know you thought baggly was a wolf. My point was that you weren't exactly shouting down the walls for people to vote for baggly. So you didn't seem to have the strongest feeling about Baggly, but afterwards it seemed very strong in reply to lorcan.

Did anyone shout down the walls to get others to vote the same as then? I was strongly surprised he flipped lipped nrv, hence my post.

What part of this are you not getting?

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Necro Wrote: Lynch at 9pm

Lynch Form Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdecVtww714ZBlvLqHPE8sNTBsVhkOlDthqn9Xy056lUXqr8A/viewform

Trigger is running it solo tonight as I'm at panto practice so be nice to him folks

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:16 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: At the moment everyone is flinging shit and hoping some sticks somewhere, it's the perfect place for the wolves to hide.

Most agree there's at least one wolf in the Baggly voters so start looking at those of us who voted for him.

but there is two wolves elsewhere, why ignore them?

how many players we got?

1 in 5 or 2 in ????

i think the odss of finding the 2 are higher.

(05-10-2021, 07:30 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:23 PM)Barney92 Wrote: That's different to what was said originally. By all means suspect me because ceejay was killed after voting for me. I'd imagine that was a handy bonus for the wolves in killing ceejay had they actually hit the seer.

who would be on your suspect list at the moment?

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:16 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: At the moment everyone is flinging shit and hoping some sticks somewhere, it's the perfect place for the wolves to hide.

Most agree there's at least one wolf in the Baggly voters so start looking at those of us who voted for him.

but there is two wolves elsewhere, why ignore them?

how many players we got?

1 in 5 or 2 in ????

i think the odss of finding the 2 are higher.

(05-10-2021, 07:23 PM)Barney92 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:18 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: @Barney92 everyone is suspect, cee_jay is gone after voting you for lynch last night, so you can see why suss on you

That's different to what was said originally. By all means suspect me because ceejay was killed after voting for me. I'd imagine that was a handy bonus for the wolves in killing ceejay had they actually hit the seer.

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:35 PM)Duffman13 Wrote: Nothing out of the baggly voters

Guirienespana out of the non baggly voters

Two biggest wolf leans at the moment

Why though?

(05-10-2021, 07:39 PM)Barney92 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:33 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: Did anyone shout down the walls to get others to vote the same as then? I was strongly surprised he flipped lipped nrv, hence my post.

What part of this are you not getting?

I am getting what you are saying Leg End. It's you that doesn't seem to think I have any point at all which is surprising to me because it was a very strong statement to lorcan. 
And no I don't think anyone was shouting down the walls, I wasn't anyway. However if duffman was revealed as nrv I wouldn't have said they were the wolfiest nrv I ever played with. No-one else said anything that strong.
But you clearly don't think I have any reason to question it and no-one else seems to either because they haven't weighed in.

(05-10-2021, 07:28 PM)Barney92 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:21 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: There wasn't a discrepancy - I thought he was a wolf, when he flipped village I remarked that he was the wolfiest nrv I've ever played with in response to Lorcan asking for people's thoughts on the lynch.

I can't make it clearer than that.

I know you thought baggly was a wolf. My point was that you weren't exactly shouting down the walls for people to vote for baggly. So you didn't seem to have the strongest feeling about Baggly, but afterwards it seemed very strong in reply to lorcan.

(05-10-2021, 07:40 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Neowise Wrote: but there is two wolves elsewhere, why ignore them?

how many players we got?

1 in 5 or 2 in ????

i think the odss of finding the 2 are higher.

9 players left - 3 rv, 3 nrv and 3 wolves.

If everyone is convinced there's at least 1 wolf in the Baggly voters it's a good place to start looking. It doesn't mean we just look there.

(05-10-2021, 07:29 PM)LadySkunk Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:05 PM)LadySkunk Wrote: Yeah her instincts but you're following the thread, what are your own opinions?

I've been posting what I think. I'm suspicious of Neo and Duffman for being last undeclared votes after little interaction with and on baggly. Especially because Neo was potentially up for the lynch. But I'm also suspicious of you for what I said before and because you don't have any opinions of your own and are using those of a dead villager

(05-10-2021, 07:23 PM)Neowise Wrote: i explained this already, and i explained it to you yesterday too, when you went on about me not reading your posts. I am reading your posts, but in order of you posting them.

Unless I'm mistake, what leg end was saying was that baggly was suspicious of me yesterday and then you came on later and were also suspicious of me. Baggly was suspicious but he never declared he was voting for me. Then you declared you were voting for me. I only responded to it because I remember how the day went because it involved me

(05-10-2021, 07:41 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:23 PM)Barney92 Wrote: That's different to what was said originally. By all means suspect me because ceejay was killed after voting for me. I'd imagine that was a handy bonus for the wolves in killing ceejay had they actually hit the seer.

you agree they were seer hunting.

But your logic is bad. Had they actually hit the seer, what difference does it make who she was voting, it would had been the comment that she was munched for, the statement that there is a wolf in the baggly voters that would have been looked at, not who she voted for, before getting a seer result.

Why the spin?

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:12 PM)Neowise Wrote: I've assumed they have up until 5:59:59pm to vote.

Neo if you assumed that wolves have until 5.59.59 to vote then why are you so certain they were role hunting Cee Jay? Would seer not have had the same window to peak, so wouldn't have got results until 6pm?

(05-10-2021, 07:50 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: We have a seer, start peeking, help the village

(05-10-2021, 07:32 PM)LadySkunk Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:28 PM)Neowise Wrote: this is weak.  we know 100% that ceejay was a villager. better using her dead villagers ideas than anybody else.

Better using a dead villagers opinions than being a villager yourself and forming them for yourself? I think it's more weak to hide behind a dead confirmed villagers thoughts than have your own. What is nothing going to do now, wait for another villager to die and then use their opinions? It's an easy place for a wolf to hide

(05-10-2021, 07:45 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:28 PM)Barney92 Wrote: I know you thought baggly was a wolf. My point was that you weren't exactly shouting down the walls for people to vote for baggly. So you didn't seem to have the strongest feeling about Baggly, but afterwards it seemed very strong in reply to lorcan.

if barney flips wolf, it looks good for leg end. This back and forth is tedius and been explain well by leg end, and i don't see barneys interest as valid. there is more players in the game to look for a wolf in.

(05-10-2021, 07:50 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: We have a seer, start peeking, help the village

(05-10-2021, 07:36 PM)LadySkunk Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:31 PM)Neowise Wrote: I like that trio. I like you for seeing that trio.

You like that someone says other people are scrambling once the heat is on them and they're questioned on it? Make it make sense

(05-10-2021, 07:12 PM)Barney92 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:10 PM)nothing Wrote: Does anyone else feel like Duff, LadyS and Barney are scrambling to point fingers at everyone else?

I'd rather throw suspicions around than say I think I'll suspect Barney because someone else who is no longer in the game and wasn't a seer voted for them.

(05-10-2021, 07:45 PM)Duffman13 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:40 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: 9 players left - 3 rv, 3 nrv and 3 wolves.

If everyone is convinced there's at least 1 wolf in the Baggly voters it's a good place to start looking. It doesn't mean we just look there.

I'm more inclined to look outside the baggly voters at this point but I would say that.

I think 2 wolves off the wagon and only one on it if I were a gambling man

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:12 PM)Neowise Wrote: I've assumed they have up until 5:59:59pm to vote.

Neo if you assumed that wolves have until 5.59.59 to vote then why are you so certain they were role hunting Cee Jay? Would seer not have had the same window to peak, so wouldn't have got results until 6pm?

(05-10-2021, 07:40 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Neowise Wrote: but there is two wolves elsewhere, why ignore them?

how many players we got?

1 in 5 or 2 in ????

i think the odss of finding the 2 are higher.

9 players left - 3 rv, 3 nrv and 3 wolves.

If everyone is convinced there's at least 1 wolf in the Baggly voters it's a good place to start looking. It doesn't mean we just look there.

(05-10-2021, 07:56 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote: Neo if you assumed that wolves have until 5.59.59 to vote then why are you so certain they were role hunting Cee Jay? Would seer not have had the same window to peak, so wouldn't have got results until 6pm?

seer usually gets results anytime they ask after lynch.

(05-10-2021, 07:59 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:40 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: 9 players left - 3 rv, 3 nrv and 3 wolves.

If everyone is convinced there's at least 1 wolf in the Baggly voters it's a good place to start looking. It doesn't mean we just look there.

so, 1 in 5 and 2 in 4,

why are we not focused in the 2 in 4, thats a 50/50 chance of a wolf.

(05-10-2021, 07:41 PM)Barney92 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)Neowise Wrote: but there is two wolves elsewhere, why ignore them?

how many players we got?

1 in 5 or 2 in ????

i think the odss of finding the 2 are higher.

Why do you say 1 in 5?

(05-10-2021, 08:00 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:41 PM)Barney92 Wrote: Why do you say 1 in 5?

5 baggly voters, 1 wolf there, 2 in the other 4.

(05-10-2021, 06:49 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 05:21 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: I did think it could be between myself and Baggly, as I did think I was for the lynch 

Sorry Baggly 

Is it safe to assume one or two wolves in Baggly voters

I'd say 1 wolf there.

What are you basing two on?

(05-10-2021, 08:00 PM)Neowise Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:41 PM)Barney92 Wrote: Why do you say 1 in 5?

5 baggly voters, 1 wolf there, 2 in the other 4.

(05-10-2021, 08:01 PM)Duffman13 Wrote: Let's speed this up, I'm BG

I'm on a lot of lists and that's my own fault but here we are. I'm not rolling the dice on the lynch tonight cause I actually don't need to. I knew I'd be getting eyes today

Also I'd say wolves had till 6pm to get munch in as I had this limitation on protects

(05-10-2021, 07:49 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote:

(05-10-2021, 07:37 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote: Neo if you assumed that wolves have until 5.59.59 to vote then why are you so certain they were role hunting Cee Jay? Would seer not have had the same window to peak, so wouldn't have got results until 6pm?

@Neowise can you explain this to me? You think wolves were role hunting Cee Jay based on a post between 5-6pm, but then by your logic the seer should have until 6pm to peak so it wouldn't make sense for wolves to be role hunting based on a post between 5-6pm? 
If I'm reading something wrong here let me know