(04-10-2021, 08:57 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]oh, and i can get an extra vote, yay
What? How? Why?
its detailed in the OP.
(04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ]If I am gone, so long, go village
Why would you be gone Liz?
(04-10-2021, 08:59 PM)cee_jay Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ]If I am gone, so long, go village
Why would you be gone Liz?
Very odd post, I'm skim reading catching up but didn't see anything heat wise in her direction
VOTING CLOSED
RESULTS AT 10PM
(04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]oh, and i can get an extra vote, yay
How?
(04-10-2021, 09:00 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]oh, and i can get an extra vote, yay
How?
Rule 6
(04-10-2021, 08:59 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:57 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]What? How? Why?
its detailed in the OP.
You mean last vote cast in a tie rather than 2 votes?
(04-10-2021, 09:01 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:00 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ]How?
Rule 6
Being pedantic that doesn't constitute an extra vote at all
If there's a tie in lynch voting, the last vote in takes it, so if there were 3 votes on Neo and 3 on Baggly, and Neo voted Baggly at 8.59.59pm then it would essentially count as 4 votes on Baggly and Neo would save himself
(names used for example only)
i presume Neo means he voted as late as possible so if lynch is tied his late vote could be the decider
(04-10-2021, 09:02 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:59 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]its detailed in the OP.
You mean last vote cast in a tie rather than 2 votes?
yes. thats what i mean, if nobody fights me for it, it means my vote is worth 1.99999999 votes.
(04-10-2021, 08:59 PM)cee_jay Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:56 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ]If I am gone, so long, go village
Why would you be gone Liz?
I thought I was on FFAs and bus wagon too for lynch for asking for to be peeked
(04-10-2021, 09:03 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 08:59 PM)cee_jay Wrote: [ -> ]Why would you be gone Liz?
I thought I was on FFAs and bus wagon too for lynch for asking for to be peeked
Can you compile the ffas, then we can see if you are right.
oh, i forgot about this time.. i can gp find that refer now...
(04-10-2021, 09:05 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:03 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought I was on FFAs and bus wagon too for lynch for asking for to be peeked
Can you compile the ffas, then we can see if you are right.
I was sure I read my name on @
Barney92 @
Duffman13 @
LadySkunk @
Baggly lists or suss posts
(04-10-2021, 09:10 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:05 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]Can you compile the ffas, then we can see if you are right.
I was sure I read my name on @Barney92 @Duffman13 @LadySkunk @Baggly lists or suss posts
I don't think anyone said they were going to vote for you though?
(04-10-2021, 09:10 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:05 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]Can you compile the ffas, then we can see if you are right.
I was sure I read my name on @Barney92 @Duffman13 @LadySkunk @Baggly lists or suss posts
You'll have to point it out cause I haven't mentioned your name I don't think
(04-10-2021, 09:06 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]oh, i forgot about this time.. i can gp find that refer now...
(03-08-2021, 07:05 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]10 player game, 2 wolves means 8v2.
If there is a non flavor munch tomorrow, that is 7v2, so 2 mislynches allowed before lylo.
if there is a flavor lynch, then the vig has a free shot which won't effect mislynches.
if munch is real, and the vig misses hitting wolf, we have only 1 mislynch available.
someone check my numbers.
This is the same line of thinking.
I don't think everyone declared their vote either?
(04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think everyone declared their vote either?
the purpose of day 1 ffas is so that you dont declare votes, is it not?
I rarely get involved in day 1 ffas, i think their input to the game is not really helpful.
I won't fight others on this though, but just so you know my stance.
(04-10-2021, 09:17 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think everyone declared their vote either?
the purpose of day 1 ffas is so that you dont declare votes, is it not?
I rarely get involved in day 1 ffas, i think their input to the game is not really helpful.
I won't fight others on this though, but just so you know my stance.
Oh, I've seen FFAs and then declared votes. It's more the transparency at this stage as you can see if players jump on wagons rather than go with their declared suspicions.
(04-10-2021, 09:17 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Leg End Reject Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think everyone declared their vote either?
the purpose of day 1 ffas is so that you dont declare votes, is it not?
I rarely get involved in day 1 ffas, i think their input to the game is not really helpful.
I won't fight others on this though, but just so you know my stance.
All information is helpful to the village. Hiding it only ever helps the wolves.
(04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Duffman13 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:10 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ]I was sure I read my name on @Barney92 @Duffman13 @LadySkunk @Baggly lists or suss posts
You'll have to point it out cause I haven't mentioned your name I don't think
I am sorry as I did read my name on a few posts for coming out NRV and asking to be peeked, I thought you were one @
Duffman13 so I did think I was a lynch candidate
(04-10-2021, 09:22 PM)nothing Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:17 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]the purpose of day 1 ffas is so that you dont declare votes, is it not?
I rarely get involved in day 1 ffas, i think their input to the game is not really helpful.
I won't fight others on this though, but just so you know my stance.
All information is helpful to the village. Hiding it only ever helps the wolves.
I voted @
Baggly
(04-10-2021, 09:22 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Duffman13 Wrote: [ -> ]You'll have to point it out cause I haven't mentioned your name I don't think
I am sorry as I did read my name on a few posts for coming out NRV and asking to be peeked, I thought you were one @Duffman13 so I did think I was a lynch candidate
No worries, I'll look through the others, just find it an odd post when we've had zero interaction until this point
FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
(04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
I definitely did one
(04-10-2021, 09:22 PM)nothing Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:17 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]the purpose of day 1 ffas is so that you dont declare votes, is it not?
I rarely get involved in day 1 ffas, i think their input to the game is not really helpful.
I won't fight others on this though, but just so you know my stance.
All information is helpful to the village. Hiding it only ever helps the wolves.
Not always true.
case 1
How is it helpful to the village to know were the bodyguard is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
case 2
How is it helpful to the village to know were the seer is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
i could go on, but this should prove that your statement is wrong.
(04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
Ah it was me! Your original post said something like Creaky IIRC.
(04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney
Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
Thanks for that. You have lorc on your list.
Sorry, messed up paragraphs…
FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney
Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman
Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13 or neowise.
(04-10-2021, 09:29 PM)cee_jay Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
Ah it was me! Your original post said something like Creaky IIRC.
That’s right, spellcheck is my enemy
(04-10-2021, 09:29 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:22 PM)nothing Wrote: [ -> ]All information is helpful to the village. Hiding it only ever helps the wolves.
Not always true.
case 1
How is it helpful to the village to know were the bodyguard is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
case 2
How is it helpful to the village to know were the seer is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
i could go on, but this should prove that your statement is wrong.
Let me restate that - hiding your ffa or voting is not helpful for the village. Being pedantic when you knew exactly what I meant, and trying to make out like the statement is always wrong, is quite wolfy.
(04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:06 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]oh, i forgot about this time.. i can gp find that refer now...
(03-08-2021, 07:05 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]10 player game, 2 wolves means 8v2.
If there is a non flavor munch tomorrow, that is 7v2, so 2 mislynches allowed before lylo.
if there is a flavor lynch, then the vig has a free shot which won't effect mislynches.
if munch is real, and the vig misses hitting wolf, we have only 1 mislynch available.
someone check my numbers.
This is the same line of thinking.
were you village in that game?
(04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
How many @
Leg End Reject 
(04-10-2021, 09:32 PM)nothing Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:29 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]Not always true.
case 1
How is it helpful to the village to know were the bodyguard is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
case 2
How is it helpful to the village to know were the seer is visiting?
How is hiding this only ever helps the wolves.
i could go on, but this should prove that your statement is wrong.
Let me restate that - hiding your ffa or voting is not helpful for the village. Being pedantic when you knew exactly what I meant, and trying to make out like the statement is always wrong, is quite wolfy.
If the wolves know where a wagion is, it makes it easy for them too join.
FFAs were origionally meant so as you could hide who you were voting for, so wolves couldn't deduce the lynch result before hand and gain advantage from decalred voting.
(04-10-2021, 09:34 PM)jp liz v1 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:27 PM)guirienespana Wrote: [ -> ]FFAs
Baggly (253): Liz, Guiri, Ladyskunk
Barney (258): Baggly, Duffman, Liz
Cee Jay (306): Barney, nothing, Ladyskunk
Guiri (324): Duffman, Ladyskunk, Cee Jay
Liz (285): Guiri, Neo/Ladyskunk, Baggly
Ladyskunk (319): Neo, Guiri, Lorcan
Leg End (293): Baggly, Neo, Barney Lorcan (282): Neo, nothing, Baggly/Duffman Nothing (265): Baggly, Neo, Guiri
No FFA as far as I can see from duffman13, Lorcand1990 or Neowise. Maybe someone can double check.
How many @Leg End Reject
Baggly switched to me after I voted for him anyway. Don't know if he voted for me or not.
(04-10-2021, 09:34 PM)lorcand1990 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021, 09:13 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]This is the same line of thinking.
were you village in that game?
oh, going by the stats at the end, i was probably wolf that game.
(06-08-2021, 03:20 PM)Neowise Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the game necro, nice quick inaugral game.
threw together the new stats table 
player
|
games played
|
wins
|
losses
|
percentage wins
|
percentage losses
|
|---|
| cee_jay | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| Clarabel | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| Ectoplasm | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 0%
|
| ShaneU | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| JohnGreenFan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| Leg End Reject | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| Neowise | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 0%
|
| nothing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| quickbeam | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100%
|
| Trigger | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100% |
but its probably non allignment indicative, as its how i think and i'd say the same thing as either allignment.