04-08-2021, 09:15 AM
(04-08-2021, 08:49 AM)Trigger Wrote:(04-08-2021, 08:17 AM)quickbeam Wrote: My subconcious was working overnighit I think, because this is the point I wanted to come back to this morning though I couldn't remember who had made it. I disagree that the seer should wait until both wolves are peeked. If one wolf is peeked it is imperitive that that infiormation doesn't die with them, and while a lynch may be foreshadowed, a munch certainly isn't and it'd be too risky not to reveal.
I have noted that Neowise said almost as much in post 127 but Trigger still maintains waiting until both wolves are found in post 128.
So you think that the seer should make themselves known if they peek a wolf on night one?
Would that not basically render wagonomics useless and allowing the remaining wolf to munch them with near 100% certainty, taking any chance of extra information that can be gotten from the village?
I suppose its a risk assessment and the seer should be weighing everything up to make there decision
Yes. I think if the seer peeks a wolf they should come out. Wagonimics *may* be sacrificed for the chance to catch a wolf, but there's other lynches where it may be used.for wagonomics. The reveal can also be timed to hopefully give them another peek.
Noobs - "wagonomics" is the analysis of the votes for the lynch to see if wolves can be spotted from how they voted.